facthunter Posted December 18, 2022 Share Posted December 18, 2022 That projection is exactly what HE is NOT. Nev 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgmwa Posted December 18, 2022 Share Posted December 18, 2022 The money he made from his swap cards will probably only pay his legal bills for a week. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Koreelah Posted December 18, 2022 Share Posted December 18, 2022 12 hours ago, rgmwa said: The money he made from his swap cards will probably only pay his legal bills for a week. …which prompts the question: how many lawyers has he used up during his career? We know some have been disbarred because of the porkies they told on his behalf. He’s famous for not paying his bills, so how does he find legal representatives? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted December 18, 2022 Share Posted December 18, 2022 He hasn't been able to get a decent lawyer for a long time. I am watching on Meidas Touch (YouTube) how Giuliani is facing disciplinary hearings in Pennsylvania for bringing frivilous cases. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 He uses everyone he can/needs and then dumps them when the heat is on, leaving THEM to carry the can. Dear Don is the one who never fails. It's always others to blame when poor little donny gets picked on at all over anything. Con Man extraordinaire The "suckers & losers" believe in HIM being able to do NO WRONG. Nev 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgwilson Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 What ever happened to that whacko Lawyer Sidney Powell. She kept rabbiting on for ever about the election machines that had been tampered with by the Venezuelan president who'd been dead for 10 years. She & Giuliano had to be the most pathetic legal advisors you could get. Both have been either disbarred or discredited and fined etc as far as I know. Only in America. Neither would get past go just about anywhere else in the world except possibly Russia. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 Last I heard was that in a defamationn trial, part of her defence was she knew what she was saying was BS, but it was so peposterous, she didn't believe anyone would take he seriously. This is the latest I could find on her lawsuit: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judge-tosses-sidney-powells-counterclaims-dominion-defamation-case-2022-09-28/ She is fighting misconduct charges.. This is the latest I could find: https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/trump-ally-sidney-powell-loses-bid-end-wisconsins-sanctions-appeal-2022-11-09/ I would have expected CNN to have a plethora of news on her, but couldn't find much 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onetrack Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 There is NOT ONE SINGLE lawsuit that Trump has lodged, claiming election fraud, that has not been thrown out of court before it even reached the first stages. Every single thing that Trumps lawsuits presented as "evidence", was based on "speculation, rumors or hearsay". The Donald may be able to get away with lies, BS, speculation and outright bragging in speeches to his adherents - but when it comes to presenting TRUTHFUL evidence, he's just all piss and wind. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-courts-election-idUSKBN2AF1G1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Marty_d Posted December 19, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted December 19, 2022 There'll probably be a bunch of copyright breach lawsuits added soon. Apparently his NFT's are photoshopped from images on the net, used without permission. Still, he sold 45,000 of them at $99 each. If my maths is correct that's 4.5 million for absolutely nothing. I think the buyers are stupider than he is. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted December 19, 2022 Share Posted December 19, 2022 Copyright laws, as I understand a little vague. If he photshopped his head directly onto other photos, yes, he is likely to be subject to copyright claim, assuming those original images were not provied under public licence (see pixabay.com, for a whole host of royalty free images as long as you change them somewhat). But if the images were altered enough, and don't ask me on how much is enough, but it isn't enough so they are unrecongnisable in their original form, then he is OK. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 Donald Trump is the first ex-USA president to have been recommended to face criminal charges by a House Committee: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/dec/19/trump-criminal-charges-jan-6-panel-capitol-attack The house is voting on wherther his tax records should be released. The press is considering this another "blow" to Trump, but haven't past presidents released their tax returns without issue? (sarcastic rhetorical question). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 It's my understanding that By and Large they have. Trump makes his own rules and It goes like "Heads I win . Tails you lose". and being wrong is for other people. Nev 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgmwa Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 Even if they decide not to make them public they could presumably be subpoenaed by the various prosecutors investigating Trump’s business dealings. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted December 20, 2022 Share Posted December 20, 2022 His Accountant/Lawyer originally made one years figures available ,The ONLY year he paid TAX apparently. Nev 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgmwa Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 Looks like the House Committee has decided to make Trump's tax returns public. Should be interesting but I would have thought a risky move politically. I half expected them to rely on the returns turning up as evidence in his business trials, being leaked to the newspapers and made public that way. The result would have been the same but they would have avoided setting what will be seen as a partisan precedent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man emu Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 I thought he was the partisan precedent 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgmwa Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 That's just one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onetrack Posted December 31, 2022 Share Posted December 31, 2022 So now, the Jan 6 committee has succeeded in getting Donald Trumps tax records made publically available - and they show, just like the Man himself, they're nothing more than inflated BS. "Creative accounting" comes to mind when Trumps financial wranglings are opened up to scrutiny. Inflated valuations, dubious loans and payments disguised as tax deductions, all feature large in Trumps tax records. The IRS isn't coming out of this looking too good, either. But the bottom line is, Trump is crowing about all the "great buildings he's built, and the thousands of jobs he's created" - but as with all corporate rorters, he's done it by making the ordinary taxpayer pay for his wealth and flamboyance, while he paid virtually zero tax. He just treats the public like suckers, as no doubt he believes they are. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-31/key-takeaways-from-donald-trump-s-tax-returns/101816306 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomadpete Posted December 31, 2022 Share Posted December 31, 2022 The average US voter will not see this as anything bad enough to stop voting for him. It is universally expected that any successful wealthy guy won't be paying tax. Somehow they cannot see this is actually proof that a person lacks integrity. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Koreelah Posted January 1, 2023 Share Posted January 1, 2023 14 hours ago, nomadpete said: The average US voter will not see this as anything bad enough to stop voting for him. It is universally expected that any successful wealthy guy won't be paying tax. Somehow they cannot see this is actually proof that a person lacks integrity. On the contrary, if a rich bugger brags about avoiding tax, lots of the dumb voters think he’s a great success! Reagan started the decline in America, refusing to accept the link between a wide tax base and a successful economy. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/09/the-happiest-countries-in-the-world-also-pay-a-lot-in-taxes.html https://www.spcc.pl/en/node/18278 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted January 1, 2023 Share Posted January 1, 2023 Oh, it was along time beforeRegan.. He did the trickelw down BS.. Nixon espoused anti "socilast" (Socialist in the US means the wealthy meet their tax obligations..) 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomadpete Posted January 1, 2023 Share Posted January 1, 2023 2 hours ago, Old Koreelah said: On the contrary, if a rich bugger brags about avoiding tax, lots of the dumb voters think he’s a great success! That is what I tried to say - I rather hope that you are actually agreeing with me 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted January 1, 2023 Share Posted January 1, 2023 (edited) The RICH will always want their slaves and the rich make the policies by putting in a favourable government if they are not watched and counteracted.. Vote while they still allow it. and THINK a bit. Nev Edited January 1, 2023 by facthunter 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Koreelah Posted January 1, 2023 Share Posted January 1, 2023 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 I have been watching on an off the US House election of a speaker, which is a complete debacle. But, who would have guessed this: It is no joke. I watched the nominations for the 11th round, and Ted Gaetz/Maetz gave some spiel about how the US was better under Trump and nominated him. I didn't watch the vote, but I guess he was the only one who voted for Trump. Apparently, under the constitution, anyone can be nominated and elected speaker of the House... there is no requirement to be elected: https://www.newsweek.com/how-donald-trump-can-become-house-speaker-1771526 I need to get a life. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now