Jump to content

Migrants taking our jobs


pmccarthy

Recommended Posts

Today's paper tells me that the shortage of labour in Oz, or the near-full employment, can be entirely accounted for by the lack of immigration over the Covid period. So the opposite must also be true. When we have unemployment, as is often the case, the cause must be excessive immigration. They really were stealing our jobs!

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely if we have more immigrants we will have greater need for more immigrants to build the houses we don't have enough of now.

We seem to have plenty of people pushing paper from one side of the desk to the other, or similar things with computers. The real shortage is of people who produce something and we have not been training theming,

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it takes four immigrants to build a house.

Were do they live afterwards? .

In the 50s & 60s poms were put into ' concentration type ' accomandation. 

Yet a lot of my Indian neabours have got mortages , that most Aussie,s can,t get.

Makes you wonder how they get their benefits .

spacesailor

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, facthunter said:

We have a duty to train our own and not pinch people from other countries to  make up for our deficit. It's used to drive wages DOWN. Nev

I think those unskilled visas (405s??) are designed to keep unksilled wages down, but importing professionals is more about having other contriues pay for the cost of training. In the 80s, 90s, and biughties, by the way, there was a huge brain drain of professional Aussies in software, engineering, finance, and the like to Europe and the USA - so Australia for a long time was paying for the training of other countries' gain, but it did not have an effect of reducing the salaries for those professions in those countries. Certainly, in the capital cities of many countries, Aussie accents in offices were as prevalent as they were in pubs.

 

3 hours ago, spacesailor said:

Makes you wonder how they get their benefits .

I can't speak for your neighbours, but my expereince has been that "handouts" don't get them mortgages. There have been myths propagated about what migrants get. Migrants get nothing! Refugees get assistance if they finaly get to the shores, but nothing near enough to go an buy a house. Every new immigrant/Aussie I have known have been able to afford houses using the same methods as Aussies do...  There have been instances of immigrant groups abusing the system - such as the Turks who used to set up fake car accidents and claim compensation for Whiplash, etc. but these "strategies" were I guess innovation used in a bad way, and not because they were some sort of "benefit" exclsuively available to immigrants.

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those poms who were put into concentration type accomodation were thankful for that accomodation and it was in some cases better than they had come from. I know because I was one of them. It allowed us to get  a job, save and get out into the real Australia. That accomodation was not like the cold and bleak homes of pommie land.

  • Like 3
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dad bought an unfinished house (internal plaster not completed on some rooms), and moved in with 6 kids. 1956 in Deniliquin. Wouldn't be permitted today. Later, 1970's, bought a house in Melbourne and had it moved to a farm block out of Benalla. Kids had all flown the nest by then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Dad built a house entirely by himself, between 1948 and 1951, on farmland he'd owned since 1934, constructing it out of concrete bricks that he made with a small (1-brick) hand-operated brick mold. You struggled to get bricks in the late 1940's.

We moved in (Dad, Mum and 3 boys) in 1951, and despite the fact we were only 11 miles out of the centre of Perth, we had no electricity or mains water. Fortunately we had a superb underground water supply with oodles of beautiful water at 16 feet.

We all lived there until 1962, when Dad sold the farm, which he'd run a dairy on, between 1951 and 1957. However, milk quotas ruined any chance of making money from dairying, so Dad chucked it in 1957, and went back to house painting.

We still didn't have electricity on the farm when we moved out in 1962 - and moving into an Eastern Perth suburb with mains water and power and regular buses and trains to the city, was heaven for Mum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/09/2022 at 10:33 AM, onetrack said:

And all clad in the greatest advance and the finest product in building materials for the day - asbestos sheeting!  :freaked:

It got its name "fibro" by not mentioning what the "fibre" in "fibre-cement" actually was.

image.thumb.jpeg.e283952973acf1d7c73ab9700c72d03e.jpeg

 

1 hour ago, Old Koreelah said:

Like many of our parents’ generation, we built our own (if we hadn’t, we’d still be paying off a poor compromise of a house.)

Is that option even available to today’s young couples?

Yes ....But

First you have to complete and owner/builder's course https://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/housing-and-property/building-and-renovating/becoming-an-owner-builder

Then you have to have the money to pay for application fees, various insurances etc, etc

After that, you need to money to pay for site preparation and materials

All the while, you need the money to house and feed yourself.

 

If you look into getting a house built in one of our metropolitan areas, you will find that the cost of erecting a typical house on a block of land is about $250,000. It's the price of the land that is the killer. That's what takes a new house over the $1 million mark.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a great pity that it became known as "Asbestos" because fibro is not dangerous. For many years, I thought that if you heated fibro, as in a fire, you would liberate the raw fibers. This turned out to be untrue. It's a safe material, given a bad name by the semi-educated. The raw fibers are so well bound to the cement that it's a different substance.

Asbestos is a natural mineral and dust contains some. That is, the real stuff.  So don't breathe during a dust storm.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can remember as a schoolkid in 1957, after having moved into a newly-built school (all built out of that fabulous asbestos sheeting!), we'd light a fire to burn rubbish (ahhh, the joys of no restrictive rules and regulations), and then throw scraps of asbestos left over from the school build onto the fire, and get our jollies watching them explode with a huge "BANG!"

 

I would hazard a guess it was caused by residual pockets of moisture in the cement in the sheeting that caused the stuff to explode.

 

That school was totally demolished around 2010, because it was deemed an exceptionally dangerous building to work in, thanks to the major levels of asbestos!

 

Edited by onetrack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We used asbestos for insulation material when I was building chimneys, before the dangers were made known. I used to go home after work, looking like father christmas with an asbestos coated beard. That was up to the seventies, so 50 years later and mu lungs are just about perfect. I also used to cut asbestos pipe in the eighties. I still have fragments of asbestos cloth knocking around. The danger is not necessarily from coming in contact with asbestos, but depends upon your susceptability to it.

I reckon a lot more fuss about it goes on than is logical and in my opinion fibreglass insulation is dangerous, it is definitely more uncomfortable on the skin.

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...