Marty_d Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) So when circumstances change, you would rather the government of the day either stuck to their election promises or call an election every time they needed to pivot? What the hell do we elect them for then? When Howard and Costello brought in the CGT discount in 1999 (from which the wealthiest 10% get 80% of the benefit), did they take it to an election? Edited 21 hours ago by Marty_d
Siso Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago There is a difference when things change. They were asked several times during the election and they said flat out NO. Not much has changed since the election. Housing has been an issue for a long time now. As far as the Howard and Costello thing, Like I said they are all the same and we should get and expect better.
Marty_d Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago It's not just housing. The ratio of working age people to retirees continues to drop. It's only fair that income from assets is taxed at the same rate as income from labour.
facthunter Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago As long as you deduct the amount equalling the rate of Inflation over the Period under consideration , it's fair. The rich can afford tax dodges. Nev
randomx Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) When housing is 71/2 to 101/2 the average wage when it's meant to be 3 and 4x av wage and a couple of our cities the most expensive in the world and we're still 1mil houses short but meanwhile let in over 2mil immigration and we have more homeless than ever in history and talking whole generations missing out on owning their own home ever , well ! Yeah there's other things too, like record by "double" in small business going under, 1000s of our brightest minds leaving the country yrly or 70,000 builders just in the last 12mths going under, but you know, you'd have to be one selfish self-centred zero sighted AH not to be v v v concerned about our housing and people. Edited 15 hours ago by randomx
facthunter Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago We have some of the Biggest Houses in the world and they Produce Nothing. Factories Produce things. Abbot and Hockey Booted the Auto Makers out quite unceremoniously, and the accessories Industry disappeared over night.. with it. Abbot said they should get 'DECENT' Jobs. What a Twerp. Nev
randomx Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) Median house price mean the average . But if you think your country and people having the security of their own home, and houses being built means and produces nothing, well, wouldn't even know where to begin. As for the rest, fully agree. All our Govs have been destroying it all for decades. No idea why . Edited 14 hours ago by randomx
pmccarthy Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Mean is the average. Median is halfway down the list between the highest and the lowest. 2
old man emu Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 50 minutes ago, pmccarthy said: Mean is the average. Median is halfway down the list between the highest and the lowest. It's nice to know someone has a knowledge of the various terms used in Statistics. 1
randomx Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) Yep, lets all get all technical on bullshit that doesn't even matter. Out of everything said and going on in your country, you two are all caught up on some bullshit term that means much the same thing anyway. 🤣 Edited 13 hours ago by randomx 1
red750 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 9 hours ago, randomx said: some bullshit term that means much the same thing anyway No it doesn't. Take 12 houses for sale, 10 @ $1m, 2 at $600,000. The average (mean) is 10 x $1m + 2 x $600K = $11,200,000/12 = $9,333,333 The median is $1m + $600K =$1.600K / 2 = $800K 1
randomx Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Ohhhh crikey. Who givsaneff. So what, with all that fancy twisting and turning end of the day, you reckon what 7.5 to 10.5 - some stats say 8.5 to 11.5 x the "real" average wage to buy a house in your country,with whole generations and families missing out, is all good eh. Not to mention all the other stuff going down the toilet. l don't think too many people round here have younger kids or have ran businesses. Edited 2 hours ago by randomx
nomadpete Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago Yeah, but half the families around me when I was a kid, couldn't afford a mortgage, either. Yes, I'd like to see better housing availability. And I'd also like to see fewer entitled people expecting someone else to solve their problems for them.
old man emu Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Sorry, Red, but you have it wrong. The mean is the mathematical average of all numbers in a data set. The median is the exact middle value of a data set when the numbers are sorted in order. Here is an illustration where the an original set of scores has two more included. In the illustration, the numbers 75.5, 83, and 41 &90 are obtained from the original data. The numbers 73.1, 82 and 42 are what one gets after inculding the two extra scores. 1 hour ago, randomx said: Ohhhh crikey. Who givsaneff. We give a stvff because a lot of us here have decided that accuracy in posts is important. That is why we like to see where the support for a comment comes from. In my post here, the diagram comes from a Google search for the difference between 'mean and median', as well as the fact that back in the day I did a course in statistics at Uni, and the topic is usually included in high school Maths. 1
red750 Posted 51 minutes ago Posted 51 minutes ago Never went to uni. Like it or not, some people will never own a home. Some live in rentals all their lives. The problem is there are not enough homes to buy or rent. Who builds the rentals? Investors. And if you punish the investors with too heavy taxes, the rentals don't get built. I guess I should consider myself lucky. I bought my first house in Sydney a few months after I got married in 1972. As the manager of a bank's computer centre, I got bank finance. In 1978 I was transferred back to Melbourne, where I bought my second house. I paid that house off with my long service leave pay when the bank amalgamated and as an employee of the minor partner, I was retrenched. I had worked for the bank for 29 years. I still live in that second house, so increasing mortgage interest rates or rentals don't affect me.
randomx Posted 47 minutes ago Posted 47 minutes ago (edited) 1 hour ago, nomadpete said: Yeah, but half the families around me when I was a kid, couldn't afford a mortgage, either. Yes, I'd like to see better housing availability. And I'd also like to see fewer entitled people expecting someone else to solve their problems for them. lf they couldn't afford it then at the normal 3 and 4 x the average- there's that word again, oh no- how would they have been at 7-11x av wage. But eh, as per Reds last one, l rest my case. Many here are missing the points and have been out of the real world that s these days 20yrs. l bought my first place at 25. 37acs an hr out of Melb. Same time l was running a business l built myself at 23, plus paying rent on a unit in Melb . No way on this earth l could do any of that now at 25, not one hope in hell. That same block l bought back then is now 600k. Rents are 2000 a mth min and there's so much red tape and taxes and costs and regulations in starting and running any business now you could never do what l was doing back then at 23. Not one hope in hell. Edited 33 minutes ago by randomx
randomx Posted 25 minutes ago Posted 25 minutes ago (edited) Anywayyyyy, same same. None of this bsing on here does one damn thing. As l said a few pages back. Forget all your gripes and begrudging of whatever you think of the younger generations now and l actually agree on some of it with a good portion of them myself anyway. IT's about our useless pollies and them running our country into the dirt. And that's all in the numbers, easy peasy, they're a disgrace and they're destroyng what's left of us, simple as that. Edited 24 minutes ago by randomx 1
randomx Posted 16 minutes ago Posted 16 minutes ago (edited) Oh, l was also paying rent on my little factory plus travelling up and back to my block 3x a wk plus forking out on materials and building l was doing on the place. Plus, l built a second business and ran the both up until last yr my whole working life. Edited 8 minutes ago by randomx
pmccarthy Posted 15 minutes ago Posted 15 minutes ago Our current home has doubled in value (at least) since we bought it nine years ago. We are in a very small rural town, you could call it a hamlet, and I can see no reason for that sort of increase. Fortunately, all our five kids are now approaching or past 50 years old and have paid off their hex debts and most of their house costs, but the grandkids are entering a very different world. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now