Siso

So you are worried about an Australian making money from our resources. What about all the overseas interests. Most of the money we spend on electricity goes overseas as well. I think you need to get your priorities realigned.

Hmmm the ABC!

Nuclear works!!! Well known that green h2 has a lot of challengers, not really a promising technology yet. Round trip efficiency is not that good either.

But should state governments be putting money into it? They are funding a hydrogen department as well as putting money into the plant as well as having a HV switchyard built.(Nice and shiny as it glitters in the sun)

No-one has ever really got green hydrogen right. Information is readily available that it is a lot harder then the lobbyist say it is. Someone dropped the ball.

Who mentioned Pauline?

Not really talking about dollars. just the extra CO2 that is emitted during shipping for the global warming. SA has spent millions of dollars on an ideological hydrogen plant near Whyalla for green steel. It has fallen over as many green hydrogen plants have. Anyone want to buy some H2 ready gas turbines? Governments are suckers!

This probably isn't relevant to this thread

I don't believe a tertiary education necisarily makes a good politician. I would say the mob we have had for the last 20 years (both sides) are mostly tetiary educated and they are the worst I can remember. It would be good to have some successful business people in instead of lawyers. -not large corporate business people,

So what you are saying is that is acceptable for people to come from overseas and have riots in the streets of Australia because of some past disagreements on the other side of the world. I don't!

Be better for global emissions and Australia if we processed here though. Put some of the governments emissions subsidies into building more furnaces. They won't because of the perception that it is dirtier even though we get told its a global problem. You are right cruise ships burn bunker oil, fail to see what this has to do with steel production. that we can and have done here before.

I don't know what Trump has to do with this, or the amount of O2 in the atmosphere. After googling it, it appears that 30% of the weight of the ore is o2. This means for every 100,000 tonnes of ore we send overseas the ships are displacing 30,000 tonnes of o2. This weight is how much extra water the ship needs to be displacing so it is quite a significant number burning a lot more bunker oil. These ships carry between 180,000 and 400,000 tones of ore by the looks of it. The useful part of the ore is the iron!

Trump and Pauline seem to get their names twisted regularly on this forum.

because we care more about our enviromental and worker conditions then other countrys.

sorry, meant their culture ect.