Jump to content

Fighting corruption in Australia


Bruce Tuncks

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, nomadpete said:

Thanks Jerry.

Now I can start the week really depressed.

So what can a simple minded punter like me do about this?

Sadly, politics is all about winning and staying in power.. Democracy is not under threat because of the pollies, nor the media. We like to blame them, but the reality is that democracy is under threat becaise of the electoriate. Too lazy to think about it between the ballots; too lazy to get the facts; to gullible to what they hear when it conforms to their agenda; to dismissive of the facts when it conflicts with their agenda.

 

The pollies know this, and who would blame them? Play the system; try and do the right thing and you will be out on your ear as the system's rearguard action is a tsunami too big for virtually every individual player.

 

So, how do you bring about change.. Individually, it is very hard, unless you make it a personal crusade, and even then, it requires massive resources. As pollies don't like the idea of being booted out, something we can still collcetively do, a petition could be a good way to demonstrate to them they risk losing many votes if they continue down a path. In fact, this is how I got a start in Aussie politics, though not too long after, I decided it was a mugs game.

 

The other way is to write to your MP. Obviously one letter won't do much, but If you live in a marginal seat, and you can get a bunch of people to write to them, it can have a profound impact - at least on them. After all, they don't expect everyone with the same grip to write to them; they may well assume 10x, 100x or even 1000x the people that write top them threatening to send their vote elsewhere (even if you don't mean it) won't write in, but will just do it. That can be very convincing to them.

 

If you're in a safe seat, then still wrtite to them; Obviosulyt try to enocurage others,  too. Since the last federal election, nothing is safe, and it can be sombering if they get enough correspondence.

 

Of course, you can organise, or join a pressure group or some other activist group...

 

Obviosuly, it's an uphill battle, but they won't know how the electorate feels about something, or even if the electorate even knows about something, unless you tell them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jerry_Atrick said:

Of course, you can organise, or join a pressure group or some other activist group...

Therein lies the rub! While a group can be easily gathered initially, it takes money to function, even if it is simply to put an ad in the local rag to call a meeting. Isn't that one of the things that these new rules aim to curtail - the getting of financial support?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jerry_Atrick said:

democracy is under threat becaise of the electoriate. Too lazy to think about it between the ballots; too lazy to get the facts; to gullible to what they hear when it conforms to their agenda; to dismissive of the facts when it conflicts with their agenda.

I can't speak for others, but I do not have any levers to pull that would influence the path that any politicians follow. I disenchanted because I have no pathway to have my voice considered by decision makers.

You seem to say that it is all the fault of the electors. I disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spacesailor said:

Please write

And

Complain the , ' new-ish ' , law to add. Half a year to your pension age every two years .

is Not a " happy ending" for All workers. Or House persons .

Some of us get very litte " superannuation  " .

spacesailor

 

 

The two yearly phasing in period is finished now. From July 2023, everyone born after 1st. January 1957 has to wait until age 67. All those born before that date have already attained their respective retirement ages.

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then Again !.

They Are Not Free to abstain. 

 

Same as " fluoridation of our drinking water .

Did I miss that important " referendum " .as I don't remember being ' asked if I wanted it .

spacesailor

Ps , Norway or some other Scandinavian country. 

Edited by spacesailor
A little more !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original "Purpose" of voting being compulsory was to stop the bosses preventing YOU from voting. I'm pretty sure things like keeping  to the correct side of the road and obeying the speed limits are enforced in most places.  Do you STOP when the light is RED? .  Have you ever used a fluoride tooth Paste?. Most people don't drink water. The bulk of it goes other places where the fluoride does nothing.  Nev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compulsory Meditation? There may be a case for that to reduce stress.

    Dentists use  fluoride to harden tooth enamel. Too much and your teeth go mottled. Lead is a known cumulative poison, banned for good reason. Maybe banning should be banned?  No one can tell you (Compel) to do anything you don't want to.  Not sure that "lawless" society would work too well.   Nev

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt all domestic water supplies have it.  They are likely to have chlorine to meet WHO health standards for things like E Coli.  A GOOD restaurant would not serve it to a table. (In my view), as you can smell it.  I use a carbon Filter for all the drinking water at home.  Nev

Edited by facthunter
more content.
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just reading an ABC news article that enlightens me about the state of health services.

 

Maybe like me you aren't aware of how state governments approach the issue of ambulance shortages.

 

Quote:

"In New South Wales and Victoria, firefighters can respond to medical emergencies ranging from cardiac arrest, childbirth, snake bites, stroke and drug overdose to major trauma, assisting the ambulance service."

 

And, frightening for me, our Tas government has tabled similar legislation.

I'm not sure how we would be received by a person in mid childbirth or cardiac arrest, when we turn up in a fire truck to offer health care assistance!

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nomadpete said:

Just reading an ABC news article that enlightens me about the state of health services.

 

Maybe like me you aren't aware of how state governments approach the issue of ambulance shortages.

 

Quote:

"In New South Wales and Victoria, firefighters can respond to medical emergencies ranging from cardiac arrest, childbirth, snake bites, stroke and drug overdose to major trauma, assisting the ambulance service."

 

And, frightening for me, our Tas government has tabled similar legislation.

I'm not sure how we would be received by a person in mid childbirth or cardiac arrest, when we turn up in a fire truck to offer health care assistance!

The USA have been doing it for years - that's what EMT is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would much prefer the fire brigade to nobody. Anyway, I reckon there is far too little attention given to the benefits of democracy vs dictatorships. Sure, we can vote in some silly and lazy farts, but at least we have the ( theoretical) possibility of voting them out again.

I would like to see the true democracies of the earth form their own association and not allow dictatorships anywhere near.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...