Marty_d Posted Wednesday at 12:09 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:09 PM He's only trying to keep the birds off his oranges, not starve them to death 1
red750 Posted Saturday at 12:53 AM Posted Saturday at 12:53 AM We've all heard the news regarding child care centres and the Working With Children check. My complaint is that the coverage is spread so wide, it has become unmanagable. I am a volunteer at our Men's Shed. I don't do much because most of the guys don't need help with what I was accepted for - assistance with computers, internet, email accounts and digital photography. What do those two thoughts have to do with each other? As a volunteer, I am considered an employee of the company which runs the shed. In other operations of the company, three suburbs away, they have activities involving children. As an employee of the company, I am required to hold a Working With Children certificate and undergo police checks, even though the youngest person through our doors would be over 50. What a waste of admin and police effort. 1
facthunter Posted Saturday at 01:00 AM Posted Saturday at 01:00 AM That's what happens when you go too Big and get $$$$'s INVOLVED. Nev 1
onetrack Posted Saturday at 02:32 AM Posted Saturday at 02:32 AM And the system is a complete failure, as evidenced by the childcare victims and the number of schoolteachers, police, and people of "high standing", who are now being caught on a regular and seemingly increasing basis, for deviant activities. 1
nomadpete Posted Saturday at 04:05 AM Posted Saturday at 04:05 AM (edited) Gripes.... My relevant gripe is that the "Working With Vulnerables" blue card has become as cumbersome and ineffective as a ASIC card. I am required to hold a Blue Card to be a volunteer fire fighter. Next thing, they will want every human to have one, just in case they encounter a person who is under the age of consent.. Edited Saturday at 04:09 AM by nomadpete Gritting my teeth. 2
spacesailor Posted Saturday at 04:52 AM Posted Saturday at 04:52 AM but !. Under the age of ' consent ' didn't stop a " politician " from paying To get those " under-age " girls pregnant . Then the parents had to pay more for their daughters ' abortion ' . spacesailor
Marty_d Posted Saturday at 05:57 AM Posted Saturday at 05:57 AM 5 hours ago, red750 said: We've all heard the news regardibg child care centres and the Working With Children check. My complaint is that the coverage is spread so wide, it has become unmanagable. I am a volunteer at our Men's Shed. I don't do much because most of the guys don't need help with what I was accepted for - assistance with computers, internet, email accounts and digital photography. What do those two thoughts have to do with each other? As a volunteer, I am considered an employee of the company which runs the shed. In other operations of the company, three suburbs away, they have activities involving children. As an employee of the company, I am required to hold a Working With Children certificate and undergo police checks, even though the youngest person through our doors would be over 50. What a waste of admin and police effort. Maybe some of the members are in their second childhood? 1
facthunter Posted Saturday at 08:06 AM Posted Saturday at 08:06 AM My " Lot " is just people gathering for a talk and coffee. Very flexible, No empire building. Nothing in Writing No money Involved. The chairman is the One who sets up the Chairs. Nev 1
red750 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Two more examples of the brilliance of closed captioning on the TV this morning: realising - rill icing stadium - stady yum
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now