Marty_d Posted Monday at 07:28 AM Posted Monday at 07:28 AM 2 hours ago, Siso said: As long as Gina isn't breaking the law good on her. She is obvously a smart woman who employs a lot of Australians. I think you're glossing over a few things here. Gina may employ around 4000 people, but she is also doing her best to lower working conditions for everyone - she is a major backer of the LNP, the IPA, and has made statements wishing Australia's employment conditions were more like parts of Africa, where people are willing to work for $2 a day. Not sure why she thinks everyone except her should work for peanuts, given her wealth has increased from the poverty line of $75,000,000 she inherited in the 90's to around $40,000,000,000 now. 3
facthunter Posted Monday at 07:57 AM Posted Monday at 07:57 AM Even Lang Hancock couldn't STAND Her and he's her father. Nev 1
onetrack Posted Monday at 08:11 AM Posted Monday at 08:11 AM I think you serfs need some re-training to understand just how much we owe our superb living conditions in Australia, to the Hancock Robber Baron Dynasty. Gina tells me this every day, on every inscribed message, on every monument built to the Hancock Empire. You're such an unappreciative lot of slackers. 😄 2
old man emu Posted Monday at 08:54 AM Posted Monday at 08:54 AM There is talk that after teh South Australian State elections next month, the Libs will not have a seat in the House. A massive Labor win, but with minor Parties and Independents sitting opposite. There will be no constructive Opposition. 1
willedoo Posted Monday at 09:28 AM Posted Monday at 09:28 AM It must be scary for the Libs polling 14% primary vote a month out from the election. One Nation is polling 10% more than the Libs. 2
willedoo Posted Monday at 09:51 AM Posted Monday at 09:51 AM It's hard to see a way back for the Libs in SA for the foreseeable future, particularly with the popularity of the current premier and his mob. Here in Queensland in 2015, the Labor opposition went into the election with just seven seats and won another thirty five to win government, but in that case the sitting premier Can-Do was as popular as a turd floating in a punchbowl. Different in SA, the Libs are trying to compete against a very popular incumbent. 1
Siso Posted Monday at 09:26 PM Posted Monday at 09:26 PM As long as she is not doing anything illegal, good on her still. Large companys always push the boundrys. Qantas selling seats on flights that don't exist, com bank, woolies, coles. Put some CEO's in jail will fix it. 3
facthunter Posted Tuesday at 02:24 AM Posted Tuesday at 02:24 AM SHE doesn't turn ME ON, tiger and I can't see how talking to her would be anything put a test of Endurance. Can you imagine HER as PM representing the COUNTRY? Nev 1
facthunter Posted Tuesday at 04:47 AM Posted Tuesday at 04:47 AM IF the AFP find she was doing something illegal she will scream to high dudgeon "THEY" are COMMING for Me. I think she has already done that, cheered on by Merde OK as usual. .Nev 1
willedoo Posted yesterday at 03:07 AM Posted yesterday at 03:07 AM The polling varies quite a bit from one pollster to another. The latest DemosAu poll has the primary vote at Labor 29%, One Nation 28%, Coalition 21%, Greens 12% and others 10%. They didn't give a preference figure but their seat preditions based on that poll were Labor 76–85. One Nation 43–54, Coalition 9-20, Greens 0-2 and all others 3-7. One change in the demographcs was women being most likely to vote One Nation at 29%, compared to Labor 27% and the Coalition 21%. The Guardian Essential poll had Labor on 30% primary, Coalition 26%, One Nation 22%, Greens 11%, independents and others 7% and 4% undecided. That poll also found nearly 60% of Australians would be open to voting for One Nation at the next federal election, including nearly half of those currently backing Labor. Around a quarter of voters said they would definitely vote One Nation and a third said they were open to it. There's more than two years to go to the federal election, so all these figures are worrying to the major parties but they have a long period to try and get that support back. 1
facthunter Posted yesterday at 03:12 AM Posted yesterday at 03:12 AM Libs are the Most Precarious by far.. Lot of work to do there. I blame the NP for a lot of that. . Nev 1
willedoo Posted yesterday at 03:26 AM Posted yesterday at 03:26 AM They're stuck between a rock and a hard place. Move too far to the right and they lose votes to Labor and the Teals. Move too far to the left to try and be Labor-Lite and they lose votes to One Nation. 1
onetrack Posted yesterday at 03:43 AM Posted yesterday at 03:43 AM The Liberals have virtually ceased to exist as a party in W.A. They could hold a cabinet meeting in a disabled toilet. 2
old man emu Posted yesterday at 04:06 AM Posted yesterday at 04:06 AM Is that a toilet for persons with disabilities, or simply a busted loo? 1
facthunter Posted yesterday at 04:10 AM Posted yesterday at 04:10 AM A full Big drop one. Complete with red Backs. and no newspaper to wipe your ass.. Nev 1
willedoo Posted yesterday at 04:55 AM Posted yesterday at 04:55 AM (edited) When Campbell Newman won his messiah-like election in 2012, there were a lot of jokes about the Labor opposition all fitting into a Kombi van to drive to parliament house. Three years later they went from seven seats back to government. The LNP made a huge mistake with Newman. John-Paul Langbroek would have easily won the election for the LNP, but the party bosses thought Newman would increase the vote even more. They ended up a three year flash in the pan whereas with Langbroek they probably would have served multiple terms. The messiah election tactic worked with Bob Hawke, but Newman was a total disaster. Edited yesterday at 04:56 AM by willedoo 2
facthunter Posted yesterday at 06:21 AM Posted yesterday at 06:21 AM His Mother Jocelyn was a politician and was fine. to deal with. Campbell was a military Nut case. So is Jeff Kennet, even though He's fine to talk to. I'm NO fan of R.J. HAWKE. Rupert Hamer and Ted Baillieu were OK. Bolte and Naptime NO. Cain Not Much. Nev 1 1
willedoo Posted yesterday at 06:44 AM Posted yesterday at 06:44 AM Newman upset a lot of people during his three year term and lost a lot of support. Then he shot himself in the foot by going troppo in the last two weeks of the campaign. First he accused the Qld. Labor party of being funded by the outlaw motorcycle gangs, then he told people that if they didn't elect the LNP in their electorate, they would lose government funding for the electorate if the LNP was returned. That's a couple of the more noteable examples, but he went quite mad in the end and his party realised he'd totally blown their chances, but at that late stage there was little they could do. Too late to put the genie back in the bottle so they got booted out. 1 1
willedoo Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Here's a fake website pretending to be the ABC with Pauline. Even without reading the article, the url specialbonds.com should be the first clue. That and the fact none of the usual ABC news site links work. https://specialbonds.com/?utm_campaign=PH-MC00051&utm_source=fb&utm_placement=Facebook_Marketplace&campaign_id=120242149574570603&adset_id=120242149574590603&ad_id=120242149762100603&adset_name=PH-MC00051&ad_name=2&utm_medium=paid&utm_id=120242149574570603&utm_content=120242149762100603&utm_term=120242149574590603&fbclid=IwY2xjawQMxPhleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETJRNmZwTzk5Y1hvRWxiNkJvc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHgQQF1WioSeP9E70e1aIaOZk3X0aHgW1Mb9DreLZtPqBZ2AqIrpCzHV8vT_Y_aem_B282BLSzZDN_eFdX0LS_ZQ#
facthunter Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Sorry, I don't even want to open it. I don't DO Facebook either. Nev 1
willedoo Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) The article is basically dressed up to look like it was written by the ABC about a supposed episode of The Insiders where David Speers had Pauline and the Comm bank ceo as guests. The storyline goes that Pauline put the bank dude on the spot so he stormed out of the interview, after which the bank complained to the ABC so they didn't air the show. They're making out Pauline let the cat out of the bag about a wonderful, foolproof crypto scheme that was helping ordinary battlers make money and pay the bills. Naturally enough, they have links there so you can send them your money. Edited 9 hours ago by willedoo
onetrack Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago It's a cunning scammy website artfully drawn up as an ABC interview, but it has links promoting scammy cryptocurrency. I wouldn't even click on the cryptocurrency links in the article, it probably goes to North Korean scam websites.
willedoo Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago One of the more obvious clues is that the ABC is being really nice to Pauline Hanson in the article. They portray as it being Pauline and David Speers against the bank CEO. There's a lot of those types of scams going around quoting various celebrities like actors and celebrity chefs. They probably picked Pauline Hanson because she's been in the news a lot lately with media coverage of recent poll results.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now