Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, randomx said:

Same with my work , many a time hrs and hrs driving across state. Could usually get abc or tripple j though so that often saved the day

If I listen to the ranting of radio shock jocks long enough, I start ranting myself. Like the army shrink in 'Alices Resataurant'.

 

These days there are social media 'influencers' doing the same stuff even more efficiently.

 

It's not only coming from Merika.

Edited by nomadpete
  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, Marty_d said:

in name we're still subjects of England's king.

When will people stop saying that?  King Charles III is the King of the United Kingdom and at teh same time he is, separately, king of Australia. 

 

This is the wording of the Proclamation of King Charles III:

 

Whereas because of the death of our blessed and glorious Queen Elizabeth the Second, the Crown has solely and rightfully come to Prince Charles Philip Arthur George:

We, therefore, General the Honourable David Hurley AC DSC (Retd), Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and members of the Federal Executive Council, do now proclaim Prince Charles Philip Arthur George to be King Charles the Third, By the Grace of God King of Australia.

 

So we are the subjects of King Charles III of the Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Agree 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, old man emu said:

When will people stop saying that?  King Charles III is the King of the United Kingdom and at teh same time he is, separately, king of Australia. 

 

This is the wording of the Proclamation of King Charles III:

 

Whereas because of the death of our blessed and glorious Queen Elizabeth the Second, the Crown has solely and rightfully come to Prince Charles Philip Arthur George:

We, therefore, General the Honourable David Hurley AC DSC (Retd), Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and members of the Federal Executive Council, do now proclaim Prince Charles Philip Arthur George to be King Charles the Third, By the Grace of God King of Australia.

 

So we are the subjects of King Charles III of the Commonwealth of Australia.

How is that different from what I said?

Posted
20 minutes ago, Marty_d said:

How is that different from what I said?

 

I wanted to make the distiction between his being king of the United Kingdom, and being king of Australia. The United Kingdom and Australia are two separate things.

 

If Australians ever decided to become a republic, it would be the King of the Commonwealth of Australia who would be replaced with another sort of Head of State.  To say that Australia's Head of State is the king of England, inferring that Australia is the subject of a foreign king, is incorrect. King Charles III wears two crowns, and the rights given by those two crowns are independent of each other. In our modern world, does it really matter where the Head of State's place of abode is located? 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Marty_d said:

Excessive nationalism puts me off.  

 

Me too. 

  I was thinking back to when I joined the RAAF in 1979. Although born in the UK, I grew up in Adelaide.  I was posted to Richmond, NSW.   Back then, people were much more parochial.  It really seemed to matter what state you were from. These days, people you meet are likely to have lived and worked in several states.

We talk of preserving our national identity, but I am not sure what that identity actually is.  I came to Australia when I was 18 months old, so I am a product of the Australian education system, yet raised by a lovely couple from Yorkshire (no, I don't have the accent).

My son was born in Australia, but is now a NZ citizen with a Chinese partner.  Amongst my son's employees, there is a German, someone from Holland, some Australians and some Kiwis.

 

It is not uncommon for younger people to work overseas. Even much, much older people, I am looking at you @Jerry_Atrick  

 

Whilst we don't want to become exactly like people from the US, we inevitably will be influenced by those we live and work with.

 

Yesterday, someone posted about the creation of an Australian-specific AI.  Being a curious person, I asked ChatGPT whether it thought there needed to be an Australian LLM.  It said "Yes to a point"  and proceeded to tell me what Australianisms it did understand and what it was likely to misunderstand.   Its examples of Australian words and phrases tended to be a little exaggerated.   We don't usually call each other cobber.   Would an Australian LLM become a cartoonish version of Australia? 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Patriotism IS the Last refuge of a Scoundrel. Don't we say Gidday MATE or "OW Ya goin?  Also, the World doesn't NEED ANOTHER Language unless it's a common one. Too many things get LOST in the translation.   Nev 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, facthunter said:

Don't we say Gidday MATE

That reminds me. My wife and I go bushwalking 3 or 4 times a week, and we have noticed something. My tendency throughout most of my life has been to say Gday.  Whilst bushwalking, when we pass someone on the trail, we usually exchange pleasantries.  People seem not to say "Gday", but instead say good morning (or afternoon).   We were wondering if "Gday"  might be getting a little old hat these days. I find myself more and more saying "good morning" (or afternoon)

Posted

I must be old school. I still always say "G'Day" to everyone. I can recall a neighbour in the country telling me a story about a visiting Yank, who spotted a few T-shirts with "G'Day" on them, and was continually perplexed.

 

Finally he asked one of the Aussies, "Hey buddy, what does this "GEE - Day" stand for, (that) I see on your T-shirts??" He thought it was some kind of special commemorative Australian  day.

Posted

Perhaps it is being raised by British parents, but I have always adapted. When I joined the RAAF, we used to travel around and often go to Williamstown airbase near Newcastle. In line with my northern British roots, I would pronounce Newcastle with a short "a", no one else did. Eventually, I adapted.

The other thing for me is that as I age, I definitely don't want to be pigeon-holed as an old man with old attitudes.  My circle of friends tends to be younger than me, and like my time in the RAAF, I tend to adapt to my surroundings.   This is very much just my personal philosophy.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

l mean l can well understand at times in the past we were too much so the other way and kinda naive , but it's a far cry and way too opposite these days .

It's proven right in this thread with stuff said many times, and over in that Whirlpool thread about the same thing to- even though l hate that damn place it's gotta be ran by 3aw and the same tiny tiny minds l swear butttttt , none the less. There's a thread there l forget how long but t's bloody long, 100s of pages l think and many many people see what's happening but ofc there's the many that are clueless in it to.

But someone said it right there- he's not even sure what our identity is .

Well, if that right there doesn't tell you we're lost souls here that need something done before we just turn into America - or someone else, then you'd be blind as a bat.

 

We've even had PM's v worried about it all and wanting to limit force fed American tv here and add far greater Aus and others content instead.

Forget who they've been, wasn't that halfwit Howard l don't think ,he was so busy kissing Bush's backside but l think back at the time others were fighting him about all this very thing even then , even b4 the internet has really taken off but ofc with all that now and that hasn't even begun- it's a 20fold these days. and you can triple that again in the v near future. Anyone who can't see all that coming as also as blind as a bat even Musk is worried about it ofc not the Americanism part but the rest.

 

At anyrate, whomever mentioned an identity, nailed it, exactly and we're losing whatever we did have faster and faster. Now Albo's seeing to that yet again and on a whole nother level again and thread all it's own, we're not even suppose to mention ourselves beng an Australian these days fear of offending someone, friggin pathetic weak leaders.

 

Actually , anyone know what that Blockhead Dutton thought about all this sort of thing. Dumbest man to ever stand up there on most things but he did seem to have some very good stands on others, like immigration, housing, and so hence l'd imagine maybe holding on to Australia as well but not sure about that angle.  Could've panned out to be another yanky boot kisser to for all l know.

 

 

Edited by randomx
Posted

I don't REALLY believe America is Over riding us IF we Eliminate the Trump effect. We buy Nothing like the Amount of stuff from them that we used to. . That's THEIR Problem. Not Ours. Our dependency on THEM when Trump is so Erratic is a Cause for Concern. THAT NEEDS working through and careful handling. Thoughtful diplomacy well researched. Not Breast Beating public displays of Alpha Male Behaviour..  Nev

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...