old man emu Posted October 13 Author Posted October 13 AI, being a tool, in a similar class to robots, should adhere to the Three Laws of Robotics: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. 1
facthunter Posted October 13 Posted October 13 Only a fool would start something they Can't stop. Nev 1
nomadpete Posted October 14 Posted October 14 5 hours ago, old man emu said: AI, being a tool, in a similar class to robots, should adhere to the Three Laws of Robotics: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. Too late, OME. It looks like those rules have not been embedded in the coding. Modern developers are driven by money, not ethics. 1 1
spacesailor Posted October 14 Posted October 14 How far does A I go . Before all us humans are integrated ( with lots of new body parts ) . So an " Android " & a Human stand side by side . One with only their brain left over from the birthed animal. the other with a electro-mechanical brain in a synthetic body . spacessailor PS. : with a titanium hip/rebored prostate, & a new eye lens, ( artificial ). 1
facthunter Posted October 14 Posted October 14 Is THIS a SERIES? Don't tell me how it ends then. Nev 1
Marty_d Posted October 14 Posted October 14 It's called "Robo-Spacey" (Like Kevin Spacey but without the problematic behaviour) 1 1 1
old man emu Posted November 2 Author Posted November 2 I have just developed my own algorithm for YouTube videos. From now on, my algorithm will prevent me from continuing to watch a video if, within the first 5 seconds, it does not show a real person introducing the topic of the video. After that, if the same person is the voice heard behnd any images etc illustrating points in teh video, the algorithm will allow me to continue watching the video. 1
pmccarthy Posted November 2 Posted November 2 I have guidelines too. Ignore anything with INSANE or YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE in the title. Ignore anything with an AI picture in the title. 2
nomadpete Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago This chart was referring to USA jobs markets compared to S & P Quite a trend.
old man emu Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, nomadpete said: This chart was referring to USA jobs markets compared to S & P Quite a trend. I wish that you had posted this in the "The End is Nigh" thread. It relates more to that topic. Instead of the curve appearing as a J-curve, it has now become a K-curve. There is a lot to say about what the graph means, but what is said would be best in that other thread. Thanks for posting the graph anyway.
nomadpete Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 27 minutes ago, old man emu said: I wish that you had posted this in the "The End is Nigh" thread Well, OME, the graph represents important data on Artificial Intelligence. That's why I posted it here. But I do see your point. As yet, I haven't heard how they intend to pay the power bill that all those data centres will run up.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now