willedoo Posted yesterday at 08:52 AM Posted yesterday at 08:52 AM Yes, I think they are far better off on their own. As a party they could end up being neither here nor there. Some of them of a similar persuasion could be loosely alligned but I doubt a party would work. 1
old man emu Posted yesterday at 09:41 AM Posted yesterday at 09:41 AM Isn't a politcal party an alliance of like-minded persons? 1 1
willedoo Posted yesterday at 10:09 AM Posted yesterday at 10:09 AM It is, but it's a very tight and strict alliance normally. Stray from the party line and you get the boot is how a lot of them operate. 1
facthunter Posted yesterday at 11:54 AM Posted yesterday at 11:54 AM Party's develop Policies. If the Independents do that, they are NOT Independent. It's not a Name . it's a description. 1
Marty_d Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago There's a financial component too I believe. Labor made changes around electoral funding which benefits parties over independents. One commentator said they could form a party called "the Independents" and allow conscience votes on every issue. 1 1 1
willedoo Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago This article gives a variety of figures from four polls released this week, Redbridge, YouGov, Fox & Hedgehog and Morgan. The Fox & Hedgehog poll found if a Teal-style party ran it would have 6% support coming mostly at Labor's expense and having no effect on the combined Coalition and One Nation figures. https://theconversation.com/one-nation-surges-to-first-on-primary-votes-in-two-new-polls-284165
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now