Jerry_Atrick Posted yesterday at 07:23 AM Posted yesterday at 07:23 AM Convicts deported to a land that was not the sooverign land of the country they were deported to, are in fact immigrants. And, anyway, what is wrong with being an immigrant. Yeah, there have been some bad-uns, but many, if not most, have contributed positively econimically, socially, and dare I say, culturally. Look at the wheels of industry in Australia before it was choked by government policy - much of it by immigrants; Remeber what we called Greeks and Italians - Wogs - and their culture and cuisine were scoffed at. But now, we can't get enough of it. Asians? Turks? Much the same. There have always been issues with immigration.. And don't go saying, "yeah, but they integrated".. Not any more than the current waves.. How many of us don't remember the kid in class that had to interpret for their parents; or the concentration of new waves iof immigrants in particular areas resulting in culture, religion, shops, etc, sometimes not even showing signs in English, let alone speaking English? And people are going to say oh, yeah, but the Somalians or Afghans or whoever, are different.. they are far more violent? I can tell you living in an area resplendant of landed Italians that there was enough violence there.. Gangs, Mafia, etc.. it was all rife.. The culture politics wasn't quite as strong and you just didn't hear about it. Asians and the import of their gangs, particularly the Triad? There was scant news, but it was there. Dare I say "White australia" has its fair share of criminals? Also the news was more moderate in its ideology pushing than it is today. Remember the Sky News debacle about whippig up a storm over Samalians as they are Muslim? Turns out, they are predominantly Christian. While each wave of immigrants suffered localised racism, they weren't pilloried like they are today in the press and use as cutlure politics pawns, mainly hyporcritically by the ideological right who abhoor.... culture politics.. when it is used against them. The realitty is for any wave if immigrants comng from a materially culturally different background, where their culture and identitiy is ingrained since birth and they are middle-thrities and beyond, it takes a generation to properly integrate into societty.. Always has. Even for me, as in immigrant to the UK from a materially similar culture, I identify more closely to being an Aussie than a Brit despite spending the vast majority of my adult life here. My best mates are Australian, I support Australia in the cricket (rugby and soccer I couldn't give a toss about). I go out of my way to buy Aussie wnes (well did - off the plonk at the moment). Jeez, I still have an Aussie accent I am told (in the UK, I believe they say I have an English twang in Aus, now). My favourtie sport? Aussie rules. My favourtue content providers - Australian.. But, my kids? Both as pommie as they come.. even with the whingeing! And I find that with immigrants of all walks - even those from more ancient cultures.. many of the kids consider themselves British.. Yeah, they may not have converted to Chritianity, but in many other ways, they are British.. And the "Aussie" Culture, is essentionally a pigeon version of English culture, anyway. 1 1 1
onetrack Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago There's always been a disparity and dislike between rural/outback Australians, and city Australians. Even A.B. Paterson and Henry Lawson wrote about the disparities between the Australian "bush" and "city" cultures, in the late 1800's. Rural/outback dwellers constantly harp on about "city slickers", and how they wouldn't know the first thing about where their food and minerals come from. The gulf has only widened with so many recent inventions that make life easy, and which further detach city people from life "on the farm" or "in the mines". Add in immigration, where new cultures have no understanding, no historical links, and no education about what earlier Australians did to make life easy for them (including wartime sacrifices), and the gulf becomes bigger. However, I am heartened at Anzac Day marches to see many Asians, and other cultures that fought alongside us in many wars, also showing respect and admiration for our sacrifices. 1
octave Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago We moved to a country town in 1990 and lived there until 2011. It was an interesting place to live with a healthy mix of traditional farmers, etc., and people like us (tree change folks). When we moved there, we were worried that it it be a redneck town; however, this was not the case. There were a few redneckish types on one end of the scale and a few dropout hippies on the other side. The town was quite cohesive, not that everyone shared the politics or life philosophies, but there was quite a mutual respect for "differences" The town remained vibrant, and it still is. Rather than being in decline like so many country towns, this place thrived, attracting artists, musicians, craftspeople, etc. An interesting point regarding immigration, there was a large Chinese family called the Nomchong family. They owned several businesses around town. This family came to the town (Braidwood) in 1860. Throughout the years, they had all married other Chinese people, so they looked very Chinese, but all had the broadest Australian accents. The owner of the local electrical appliance shop was Bob Nomchong, and within the family, there was a Betty and an Eileen. Amongst the younger generations, there was a Kylie, etc. The strange thing is if I were standing next to one of the Nomchong family, I would be judged as the Aussie, and they would be assumed to be the immigrant rather than the 5th Australians https://www.cmag.com.au/exhibitions/nomchong-family 2 1
Grumpy Old Nasho Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 2 hours ago, Jerry_Atrick said: Convicts deported to a land that was not the sooverign land of the country they were deported to, are in fact immigrants. Does that even make sense? Emigrating to where ever requires a conscious decision on the part of the potential immigrant, and for permission to be given by the receiving nation. To say convicts were immigrants, surmises that the Aboriginals gave them permission to settle here. Nothing could be further from the truth. The convicts were made to settle here by the Poms, with redcoats to ensure a semblance of law and order.
nomadpete Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 5 hours ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: I'm still not an immigrant. But you are the descendant of an immigrant, same as most of us. 1
Popular Post nomadpete Posted 20 hours ago Popular Post Posted 20 hours ago Identity? WTF? National identity? WTF? Sort out your personal identity first. I will trust you relative to how you present yourself to me. We are all passengers on Planet Earth. Fussing about continental, political, or other levels of idrntity is trivial in the bigger scheme of things. 2 3
Jerry_Atrick Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 2 hours ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: Does that even make sense? Emigrating to where ever requires a conscious decision on the part of the potential immigrant, and for permission to be given by the receiving nation. To say convicts were immigrants, surmises that the Aboriginals gave them permission to settle here. Nothing could be further from the truth. The convicts were made to settle here by the Poms, with redcoats to ensure a semblance of law and order. Yes it does make sense... You ancestors decided at some stage to stay on their own free will, did they not? Even if they were went to the colony for the term of theiur natural life, when released from custody, at some stage they were relased from custody and stayed - on their own volition.. .does that not make them immuigrants at that point? Or, say thaey had kids while in custody - those kids would be, at the time British citizens.. and when they stayed, does that not make them immigrants? Or are you telling me your whole line of family are still incarcerated? We 1
pmccarthy Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 14 hours ago, facthunter said: PMC do you take your cossies in your Port? I'm trying to bring BACK Hoo Roo.. Nev. Yes to all three when I was young. And I carried a Globite port to school every day. 1
facthunter Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Ah the aroma and sight of Pulped tomato sandwiches at Mid day. Nev 1
nomadpete Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago I object to Americanisation of Australian heads. We must immediately deport anybody seen wearing a baseball cap. Especially if they wear it backwards. America will be held accountable for all ear melanomas occuring in our great country. Thank you for attention to this matter. 2
facthunter Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago There would be a Lot of driverless VN Commodores. Nev 2
Grumpy Old Nasho Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 12 hours ago, Jerry_Atrick said: Or, say thaey had kids while in custody - those kids would be, at the time British citizens.. and when they stayed, does that not make them immigrants? Or are you telling me your whole line of family are still incarcerated? You're being absurd, you're asserting that generations of offspring in a convict line are technically immigrants. Convicts were prisoners in a colony. Their only paper work was a certificate of release from incarceration at the end of their sentence, and certainly had no personal bank account. Had they not been arrested for their misdemeanour back home, they would have still been residing there in Britain, poor, and unable to travel anywhere. Suffice to say I don't subscribe to the lefty progressive's ridiculous assertion that we are a nation of immigrants, and trying to convince us into thinking we have no right to have influence over present and future immigration outcomes. It's bad enough that the major parties have joined to block discussion about it, and that's one of the reasons I've never voted for them.
facthunter Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago When I was Young I was a BRITISH Citizen even though there was 4 generations born HERE before Me I was then declared Australian as I didn't qualify to stay British. I could not care one way or the other. it made no real difference unless you wanted to reside Permanently in England. Nev 1
Marty_d Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: You're being absurd, you're asserting that generations of offspring in a convict line are technically immigrants. Convicts were prisoners in a colony. Their only paper work was a certificate of release from incarceration at the end of their sentence, and certainly had no personal bank account. Had they not been arrested for their misdemeanour back home, they would have still been residing there in Britain, poor, and unable to travel anywhere. Suffice to say I don't subscribe to the lefty progressive's ridiculous assertion that we are a nation of immigrants, and trying to convince us into thinking we have no right to have influence over present and future immigration outcomes. It's bad enough that the major parties have joined to block discussion about it, and that's one of the reasons I've never voted for them. You can think whatever you like, whether it's right or wrong. But if you turn up to a rally railing against people who got here about a minute after your family, while you're wearing clothes made in Bangladesh, shoes from the Philippines, sunnies, flag and MAGA cap from China... Well then I reserve the right to call you a bloody dickhead. How Australian is that? 2 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: Suffice to say I don't subscribe to the lefty progressive's ridiculous assertion that we are a nation of immigrants, You're just in denial.. I'll leave it at that 1
octave Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago 4 hours ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: Suffice to say I don't subscribe to the lefty progressive's ridiculous assertion that we are a nation of immigrants Whether or not you approve of the term "nation of migrants," these are the hard, rational facts. As of 2023, 31% of Australians were born overseas. The 2021 census shows that nearly half (48%) of Australians have a parent born overseas. Let's leave out the term "Nation of Migrants" if it freaks you out. Let's just say a nation with a significant number of migrants.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now