pmccarthy Posted Thursday at 10:34 AM Posted Thursday at 10:34 AM I was taught that all the Christian flavours are Catholic, just not Roman.
red750 Posted Thursday at 11:28 PM Posted Thursday at 11:28 PM Here's a Census stuffup :- https://www.realestate.com.au/news/census-night-quirk-can-make-livedin-homes-empty/?campaignType=external&campaignChannel=syndication&campaignName=ncacont&campaignContent=&campaignSource=newscomau&campaignPlacement=socref&utm_source=News.com.au&utm_medium=Facebook&utm_campaign=EditorialSB&utm_content=SocialBakers
old man emu Posted Thursday at 11:49 PM Posted Thursday at 11:49 PM Creating a questionnaire in order to get the correct sort of information it aims to get is a very difficult thing. Questions have to be carefully worded so that they cannot be misinterpreted. That is one of the problems of the written word. How many time here amongst ourselves has someone posted what appears to be a very clear comment or statment and it has been taken the wrong way by someone? That is the cause of most of the arguments here, or the missing of jokes. 1 2
willedoo Posted yesterday at 05:26 AM Posted yesterday at 05:26 AM (edited) I'd beg to differ on that. The way I see it, the cause of most arguments on this site is people playing the man and not the topic. The inability of some to debate in a civilised and well mannered way without being outright rude to people. I don't think I'd like to sugar coat straight out bad behaviour as misinterpretation. For sure misinterpretation happens but I think the inability to handle opposing viewpoints combined with bad manners is a bigger contributing factor. Edited yesterday at 05:28 AM by willedoo 1
nomadpete Posted yesterday at 05:51 AM Posted yesterday at 05:51 AM 24 minutes ago, willedoo said: I don't think I'd like to sugar coat straight out bad behaviour OME was being diplomatic. 1
old man emu Posted yesterday at 09:56 AM Posted yesterday at 09:56 AM 4 hours ago, willedoo said: I'd beg to differ on that. You prove my point, which was that the written word is frequently misinterpreted. The response is a comment on the example given to illustrate the point, not a comment on the point I was making. The comment in response, while not incorrect of itself, illustrates that the author of a text should take care that what is written is free from misinterpretation. However, an author cannot know how the mind of the reader will interpret the text. 1
pmccarthy Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 21 hours ago, facthunter said: Does that make it True?. Nev In the Christian context, the word catholic (with a lowercase "c") comes from the ancient Greek word katholikos, meaning "universal," "whole," or "all-embracing." When used in historic Christian creeds, it describes the entire, worldwide body of believers united in Christ, rather than a single specific denomination.
old man emu Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Here's an example of how the wording of a question can give rise to implications. 1. 'Do you beat your wife?' 2. 'Do you still beat your wife?' The inclusion of the word, 'still', completely changes the implication of the answer. 1
Marty_d Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Adding the words "at Scrabble" to the end completely changes the question too. 1
red750 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Wife : "My husband beats me up every morning." Husband: "Yes. I get up at 6:30, she gets up at 7 o'clock" 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now