facthunter Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 That's not the issue He's licenced whether he keeps paying or not. It would hardly be a big sum and it's his choice of whether he takes advantage of his position on this matter or not. Surrendering the licence is not a requirement. It's unlikely to be demanded and Charles may decide it's not a good look which would be fair enough. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted July 13, 2023 Author Share Posted July 13, 2023 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted August 26, 2023 Author Share Posted August 26, 2023 Here's the next instalment of the synopis.. this time Week 7. It is long - 1.5 hours.. But well worth the watch. The coal face personnel of the department were in no way unclear in their memory of wehat went on, while those senior public servants were very haxzy.. It makes you wonder how they can be claim to be experienced professionals if they can't remember that experience to apply it to theiur jobs? What is amazing is that even in the face of objective evidence, they can deny they knew about income averaging or fdor some reason they can't explain, they came to a different conclusion than emails they either read or authored themselves. One senior public servant claimed they did not even understand the email they wrote at the time! Good on Legal Aid and good on Professor Peter Hanks - as well as Deanna Amato - for finally casting this chapter of iinjustice to the history books., Made my blood boil... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 The sheer Nastiness and Vindictive nature of this foul exercise should NEVER be forgotten. Smirko doesn't admit any wrong doing. Now widely viewed as Australia's WORST PM ever. Nev 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man emu Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 ScoMo was the leader of the parliamentary arm of a political party. He became PM because of that party's parliamentarians voted for him to be their leader. All those parliamentarians who supported him as leader are accomplices in what he did. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Koreelah Posted August 29, 2023 Share Posted August 29, 2023 …and that same gang is currently having great success undermining efforts to recognise our indigenous people- over a century after NZ went much further and reserved seats in Parliament for their indig. Australia, the land of could-a-been. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red750 Posted August 29, 2023 Share Posted August 29, 2023 There are already 11 indigenous members of parliament, hundreds of indigenous representative bodies, as well as the National Indigenous Australians Agency with a staff of 1,400. If the government opened their ears, they wouldn't need a change of the Constitution to hear what the indigenous Australians want and need. If they don't listen now, they never will, Voice or no Voice. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacesailor Posted August 29, 2023 Share Posted August 29, 2023 It will divide the nation. Who-so-ever looses . Will NOT be happy . SO there will be NO winner . So much money spent , without anything constructive being achieved. The polies are trying to get Names into history . spacesailor 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now