Marty_d Posted Wednesday at 02:43 AM Posted Wednesday at 02:43 AM I think this article says more about Sam Neill than most I've seen. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/14/sam-neill-new-zealand-remembers-local-star 1
red750 Posted Saturday at 02:18 PM Posted Saturday at 02:18 PM Sir Garfield Sobers, widely regarded as the greatest all-rounder in cricket history, passed away on July 17, 2026, at the age of 89. He Played for Barbados.
old man emu Posted Saturday at 11:32 PM Posted Saturday at 11:32 PM He also played for South Australia in the early 60s and he helped them with the Sheffield Shield. 1
red750 Posted Sunday at 09:30 AM Posted Sunday at 09:30 AM They just keep comming. Aussie actor Terry Donovan, and father of Jason, has passed away.
facthunter Posted Sunday at 11:37 PM Posted Sunday at 11:37 PM None of us are getting out of THIS alive. While this list here is very active Most of us older folk experience the Loss of People. Friends and relatives we have known for ages and relatives passing on and it gets a bit depressing when you add it all up. Maybe one gets a bit of Survivors Guilt? Nev
rgmwa Posted yesterday at 12:55 AM Posted yesterday at 12:55 AM I wouldn’t say survivor’s guilt but it certainly gets your attention when you start to remember more and more people for who they were rather than who they are. 1
old man emu Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 6 hours ago, rgmwa said: for who they were rather than who they are. 'for whom they were rather than whom they are' 1
rgmwa Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Sorry OME. I'm still trying to learn this archaic language.
facthunter Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago The use of WHOM is dying out, and who being considered acceptable more often. Your time is yet to come. "To WHOM it may concern" may hang on a while . Easy to look up. Nev 2
old man emu Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, facthunter said: The use of WHOM is dying out, and who being considered acceptable more often All living languages evolve. While an academic grammarian would insist on 'whom', a linguist would accept 'who' as an example of the evolution of a language. One could say that the grammarian is pedantic, while a linguist is a realist.
facthunter Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago Glad I didn't say that. Us older folks are inclined to be Pee don'ts. Nev
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now