facthunter Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago How was it that OUR Money was spent? I hoped he'd stay in the UK .which he Obviously Prefers. He's the MAD Monk officially. The REJECT without a Cause. Nev
Litespeed Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago As a former Prime minister he gets the perks of a office, staff and lots of travel including international. 1
facthunter Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I guess the Village will have to without it's IDIOT for a while then?? He used to Pollie Pedals at $2'50 Per Hr, or was it a higher figure? How did that Guy EVER become the PM?? Nev 1
randomx Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago That's what l reckon , he was an effg cave man still is. Not that any of the other fools we have including the one in now are much better. More a matter of which one will do the least amount of damage to what's left of our country these days. 1
facthunter Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago That comparison is a bit odious and inappropriate. The Current Bloke is DEALING with a real crisis not of his Making and he's voted into the Position by the government and is Not under any Leadership threat or challenge and has government by a fair margin, in fact a record for a Long time. Nev
Siso Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago If you are talking of the fuel crisis, the current bloke has been in politics for a long time so he was/is a part of the problem!
Jerry_Atrick Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I was out of Australia when he was PM, thankfully. Although a mate of mine back in Australia was spitting chips over his performance. I asked who he voted for.. Was the Libs.. He knew what Abbott and his motley crew were like, yet he still voted for them. I told him he couldn't complain - he got exactly what he voted for. Apparently, the press for Labor was worse and Rudd probably didn't do himeself any favours, either.
facthunter Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Put up some facts Siso. . Labor hasn't been in Power the whole time and even when they are in Power the Lib/nats said NO to everything. Do your Homework No one could cover what has recently happened in the ME with the Actions of Trump and Netanyahu. There are also MANY Places much Worse off than WE are.. Murdoch and SKY NEVER let up on Albo so reading their stuff is not Likely to inform you what's really happening,, is it? Refineries went from six to two under the Libs and storage is done by refineries and costs MONEY so who would want to subsidise that and cop the BS from the Media. Nev 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Once Howard started running down the reserves, neither party has grabbed the problem and fixed it. 1
Siso Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I didn't mention who was in power! You must be feeling guilty. The whole system has been sub par for many years. I know you think the current bloke can do no wrong but they have had 5 years to repair the damage previous governments have done, but nothing has happened. He said nothing in his public address and wasted everyones time. He, they are no better than any other politician of recent times. I would love to see Albo and Bowen admit we need more processing of fossil fuels in Australia but it won't happen.
facthunter Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago We had rationing In the War. Maybe we haven't seen anything yet. The ME is affecting the entire world Not just us and WE didn't cause it. and as I've said there's Plenty Much worse off. Nev
facthunter Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago WE are already Processing more crude that stays here and active in getting it from any place Possible. Nev
Jerry_Atrick Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Some people think we are alread in WW3... and that rationing will come.
facthunter Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Some people think a lot of things. It's easy to be wise AFTER an event. This situation is far from stable because Powerful People don't want the Hostilities to stop. May they BURN in Hell. Nev
old man emu Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Talking of wasting taxpayer dollars, how does the government justify spending $20M on an advertising campaign to tell us to drive sedately to conserve fuel. $20M is enough to give every licenced driver near on $1m each. How many people are curtailing unecessary travel due to the price of fuel? At least 91 Octane is only $2.15 at the servo I go to.
facthunter Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Your Math is a bit Awry. It IS a good idea to drive More sedately and save quite a Bit of fuel and Maybe a Life or two as well. Nev 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) I like to drive and ride fast.. It is something that is tolerated here where it is relatively safe; i.e. motoways or dual carriage motorways where the traffic isn;'t too bad. The limit on both is 70mph (c. 110kph), but when I leave for London at 3:30am, I hover around the 80mph (c. 130kph) mark and pass the same police in the same spot with the same gun and they never come after me. However, drive dangerously, even when under the limit, and they guve you extremely short shrift. But, I do know when I drive or ride faster, the increase in fuel usage is noticeable. It is usied mostly to push the air out of the way, and the square rule kicks in. Amazoing how many people have slowed down since fuel prices have gone up. Edited 1 hour ago by Jerry_Atrick
Marty_d Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Teardrop shaped cars help. Apparently the Hyundai Ioniq 6 has a drag coefficient of 0.21Cd. 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted 16 minutes ago Posted 16 minutes ago This has been in development for some time: https://aptera.us/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now