Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Trump has earned a place in History. He has single-handedly destroyed a global civilisation that took oveer 7000 years and billions of lives to create. And the members of the Republican Party of the USA are co-conspirators.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, old man emu said:

Trump has earned a place in History.

That's a certainty.

 

However i cannot give him credit for single handedly destroying a global civilisation. Civilisation (not always civil) will stumble on regardless.

The tangerine toddler has simply acted out all the hidden failings of the world order. Failings that were previously dormant, or simply hidden, and until he came along, weaknesses were slowly eroding the moral fibre of world order.

 

For instance, governments of most countries have always suffered from CEO type rot. The job description calls for a ruthless, results driven psychopath, usually overpaid. 

It doesn't call for a considerate egalitarian, fairminded person. 

 

The USA has a history of overt selfishness. Their glorification of capitalism overrides the welfare of the populace. Politics and War is all about making money. It's just that tRump makes it so obvious. As with our Australian system, both major parties are plainly in the pockets of the megarich.

That is certainly not ethical.

 

 

Edited by nomadpete
  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
  • Winner 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

BOTH major parties? DO you really think so? The Libs are almost extinct and they were supported by the mega rich. Perilous Pauline is supported by Rinehart and Worships Trump. 

  LITTLE to be PROUD of is supported by Coal and Gas Interests, and represents Bugga All % of the Population. Labor is never supported by the Media or the Rich. Nev

  • Haha 2
  • Informative 1
Posted

Yes, Nev.

And labor signed off the obscene Woodside gas deal, and also passed special laws to enable the foreign owned salmon fish farms to have special pollution exemptions. So I say, 'both major parties.'

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

One party is the shyte party, and the other is the shyte lite party.

Just because one is a bit less dodgy than the other, doesn't make sun shine from it's orifice.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, facthunter said:

Just WHO IS the Other MAJOR Party Pete? Nev

I understand and agree with your view that Lib/Nat coalition is in poor shape, but in our political environment, they are still considered 'major'. Even though they only represent a minor threat at present. 

 

I hope you aren't suggesting the examples I gave, are in some way making the poor better off?

Edited by nomadpete
  • Agree 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, nomadpete said:

Yes, Nev.

And labor signed off the obscene Woodside gas deal, and also passed special laws to enable the foreign owned salmon fish farms to have special pollution exemptions. So I say, 'both major parties.'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Labors done just about everything possible to basically gut Australia. Silly bloody Aussies just don't know it yet and our Aussies that need a house or will in the future- like ahhh, our children for example, are also atm screwed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by randomx
Posted
8 hours ago, old man emu said:

Trump has earned a place in History. He has single-handedly destroyed a global civilisation that took oveer 7000 years and billions of lives to create. And the members of the Republican Party of the USA are co-conspirators.

 

 

l think Albo should be up there with him for the Australian portion of the world.

 

 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, randomx said:

 

 

l think Albo should be up there with him for the Australian portion of the world.

 

 

 

 

Scomo and Abbot were a lot worse. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
  • Informative 1
Posted

What trumpy did now?

Displayed his high standards of staff selection.

 

President Donald Trump quietly appointed Erika Kirk to the Air Force Academy board, prompting swift outrage and mockery from both sides of the political aisle.
 

  • Informative 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
On 10/03/2026 at 7:28 PM, Jerry_Atrick said:

To say Albo is the Aussie version of Chump, IMHO, is a bit rich. I agree with @nomadpete - he represents the less ship party

Nah didn't mean he's anything like Rump actually wish he was in some ways- some, just meant that he's nonetheless doing just as good a job of screwing us over here as Rump is there ha, and bloody everywhere.

  • Sad 1
Posted

Rubbish. Watch Question time.  We  don't DO Leader focussed Politics Albo wasn't born with a silver spoon in his Mouth nor does Labor serve the Rich end of town. When you look after the already Rich you then Get the REAL spoils of office, because they will  and CAN find a way to reward your efforts to aid them.  Who do you want running the Country?  Money or a fair go for the Ordinary Mortals Party.. Labor is no longer a Union Based Party. That's long gone. it's a Social Democrats Progressive Party. Nev

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

Judging by what your Past Posts contain re Trump etc, sorry, but I doubt your opinion reflects a great mental effort towards a working solution. You'd vote Hanson I would guess. Apart from being a stirrer and rampant  opportunist racist, what aims bar getting in Power and lining her own Pockets can you suggest she Might Bring?   What great bank of talent is she bringing to the Parliament. So far it's just rejects, malcontents and right wing weirdos who will have a rough time vying for Positions in the Pecking order. Imagine the Damage a person like Hanson could do to this Countries reputation? She already considers herself beyond the Law. Imitation of Trump who she Worships, and backed by Gina Rinehart's Money (which she will have to be very careful how she Manages , as well as where she spends taxpayers money, which she also receives.. How Happy will James Ashby be with the new expansion.? Don't forget she has NO legitimate person in the Lower house which is the Place where things Happen. The fruit loops are Mainly in the senate where the Party decides who gets there, not the People directly in the electorates who they represent, proportionately.  Nev

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...