old man emu Posted Monday at 09:45 PM Author Posted Monday at 09:45 PM Trump has earned a place in History. He has single-handedly destroyed a global civilisation that took oveer 7000 years and billions of lives to create. And the members of the Republican Party of the USA are co-conspirators. 1 1 1
nomadpete Posted Tuesday at 01:11 AM Posted Tuesday at 01:11 AM (edited) 3 hours ago, old man emu said: Trump has earned a place in History. That's a certainty. However i cannot give him credit for single handedly destroying a global civilisation. Civilisation (not always civil) will stumble on regardless. The tangerine toddler has simply acted out all the hidden failings of the world order. Failings that were previously dormant, or simply hidden, and until he came along, weaknesses were slowly eroding the moral fibre of world order. For instance, governments of most countries have always suffered from CEO type rot. The job description calls for a ruthless, results driven psychopath, usually overpaid. It doesn't call for a considerate egalitarian, fairminded person. The USA has a history of overt selfishness. Their glorification of capitalism overrides the welfare of the populace. Politics and War is all about making money. It's just that tRump makes it so obvious. As with our Australian system, both major parties are plainly in the pockets of the megarich. That is certainly not ethical. Edited Tuesday at 01:15 AM by nomadpete 1 2 1 1
facthunter Posted Tuesday at 01:24 AM Posted Tuesday at 01:24 AM BOTH major parties? DO you really think so? The Libs are almost extinct and they were supported by the mega rich. Perilous Pauline is supported by Rinehart and Worships Trump. LITTLE to be PROUD of is supported by Coal and Gas Interests, and represents Bugga All % of the Population. Labor is never supported by the Media or the Rich. Nev 2 1
nomadpete Posted Tuesday at 01:37 AM Posted Tuesday at 01:37 AM Yes, Nev. And labor signed off the obscene Woodside gas deal, and also passed special laws to enable the foreign owned salmon fish farms to have special pollution exemptions. So I say, 'both major parties.' 1 1 1
nomadpete Posted Tuesday at 01:40 AM Posted Tuesday at 01:40 AM One party is the shyte party, and the other is the shyte lite party. Just because one is a bit less dodgy than the other, doesn't make sun shine from it's orifice. 1 1 1
facthunter Posted Tuesday at 01:56 AM Posted Tuesday at 01:56 AM Not a very Deep and Meaningful assessment. Labor has a bad business Plan. Trying to help people who have no money to show their gratitude Just WHO IS the Other MAJOR Party Pete? Nev 1
nomadpete Posted Tuesday at 02:34 AM Posted Tuesday at 02:34 AM (edited) 38 minutes ago, facthunter said: Just WHO IS the Other MAJOR Party Pete? Nev I understand and agree with your view that Lib/Nat coalition is in poor shape, but in our political environment, they are still considered 'major'. Even though they only represent a minor threat at present. I hope you aren't suggesting the examples I gave, are in some way making the poor better off? Edited Tuesday at 02:36 AM by nomadpete 1 1
red750 Posted Tuesday at 05:14 AM Posted Tuesday at 05:14 AM David Littleproud has resigned as leader of the National Party. However, this topic is about Trump and what he does. 1
randomx Posted Tuesday at 05:43 AM Posted Tuesday at 05:43 AM (edited) 4 hours ago, nomadpete said: Yes, Nev. And labor signed off the obscene Woodside gas deal, and also passed special laws to enable the foreign owned salmon fish farms to have special pollution exemptions. So I say, 'both major parties.' Labors done just about everything possible to basically gut Australia. Silly bloody Aussies just don't know it yet and our Aussies that need a house or will in the future- like ahhh, our children for example, are also atm screwed. Edited Tuesday at 05:44 AM by randomx
randomx Posted Tuesday at 05:48 AM Posted Tuesday at 05:48 AM 8 hours ago, old man emu said: Trump has earned a place in History. He has single-handedly destroyed a global civilisation that took oveer 7000 years and billions of lives to create. And the members of the Republican Party of the USA are co-conspirators. l think Albo should be up there with him for the Australian portion of the world.
Popular Post Jerry_Atrick Posted Tuesday at 08:28 AM Popular Post Posted Tuesday at 08:28 AM To say Albo is the Aussie version of Chump, IMHO, is a bit rich. I agree with @nomadpete - he represents the less ship party, but it so far is not making some of the fundamental changes needed. I sympathise with Albo et al.. and I imagine, given his history in Labnor where we was firmly on the socialist left faction of the party, having to walk the balance of a small but powerful set of vested interests versus what is in his mind better for the community would not be an easy job. And between him and anything that the LNP have served up from Howard onwards, I would prefer him and his team and suggest Australia would poltiically and economically be in a lot better shape - assuming hubris didn't set in like it normally does. While the media play its part, in the second election of Labor, they increased their majority - so Aussies aren't quite as beholden to the media as we like to think. But the reality is for the majority of Australians, life is getting worse in a material sense while for the elite, it seems to be getting disproprotionately better and Labor are perceived as not doing enough to change things for what they promise and/orstand for. There are challenges in making change - defiinitely. And in a global economy, it is very difficult to stand up against vested interests without some real ramifications. If you think QANTAS taking its maintenance facilities to a low cost country is not representative of threats that are made to governments who want to introduce changes to even things up, think again. Many companies here have moved operations overseas because they could get a better deal and the government stared down their threats. If you lose employment as a government, there is a backlash. GBut that still does not mean we should not crticise poor judgment or performace,because it is not as poor as the other mob. That just permits the race to the bottom and people get fed up and the nutty protest parties flourish. The UK has shown this, and now, unbelievably for a country such as Australia, One Nation is getting a look in beyond rabid loonies. Of course, the US has made the protest person their leader on some chumped up promises.. but so detached from the real world are the political elite, that people have had enough. Its sort of what my Iranian employee said, it's sad it has to come to this, but something has to change. 1 2 1 1
rgmwa Posted Tuesday at 10:17 AM Posted Tuesday at 10:17 AM 4 hours ago, randomx said: l think Albo should be up there with him for the Australian portion of the world. Scomo and Abbot were a lot worse. 1 2 1
randomx Posted Tuesday at 10:20 AM Posted Tuesday at 10:20 AM For sure , couldn't stand either of them either , or Howard. lmo, there's no one out of either of the two main worth even voting for. 1
old man emu Posted Tuesday at 08:41 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 08:41 PM It is hard when 49.9% of the population doesn't like your mob. 1
nomadpete Posted yesterday at 12:32 AM Posted yesterday at 12:32 AM What trumpy did now? Displayed his high standards of staff selection. President Donald Trump quietly appointed Erika Kirk to the Air Force Academy board, prompting swift outrage and mockery from both sides of the political aisle. 1 1
facthunter Posted yesterday at 02:04 AM Posted yesterday at 02:04 AM There's nothing Classy about our "Uncouth Barbarian", Glorious Emperor.. Nev 1
randomx Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago On 10/03/2026 at 7:28 PM, Jerry_Atrick said: To say Albo is the Aussie version of Chump, IMHO, is a bit rich. I agree with @nomadpete - he represents the less ship party Nah didn't mean he's anything like Rump actually wish he was in some ways- some, just meant that he's nonetheless doing just as good a job of screwing us over here as Rump is there ha, and bloody everywhere. 1
facthunter Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Rubbish. Watch Question time. We don't DO Leader focussed Politics Albo wasn't born with a silver spoon in his Mouth nor does Labor serve the Rich end of town. When you look after the already Rich you then Get the REAL spoils of office, because they will and CAN find a way to reward your efforts to aid them. Who do you want running the Country? Money or a fair go for the Ordinary Mortals Party.. Labor is no longer a Union Based Party. That's long gone. it's a Social Democrats Progressive Party. Nev 1 1
facthunter Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Judging by what your Past Posts contain re Trump etc, sorry, but I doubt your opinion reflects a great mental effort towards a working solution. You'd vote Hanson I would guess. Apart from being a stirrer and rampant opportunist racist, what aims bar getting in Power and lining her own Pockets can you suggest she Might Bring? What great bank of talent is she bringing to the Parliament. So far it's just rejects, malcontents and right wing weirdos who will have a rough time vying for Positions in the Pecking order. Imagine the Damage a person like Hanson could do to this Countries reputation? She already considers herself beyond the Law. Imitation of Trump who she Worships, and backed by Gina Rinehart's Money (which she will have to be very careful how she Manages , as well as where she spends taxpayers money, which she also receives.. How Happy will James Ashby be with the new expansion.? Don't forget she has NO legitimate person in the Lower house which is the Place where things Happen. The fruit loops are Mainly in the senate where the Party decides who gets there, not the People directly in the electorates who they represent, proportionately. Nev 2 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now