pmccarthy Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 Never a week goes by but I see a headline or an article that confuses the words ancestor and descendant. Invariably descendants are referred to as ancestors. Today it is a headline asking whether the US government should pay compensation to the ancestors of slaves. Why are these two words confused? There must be something special about them, but I can’t figure it out. It isn’t difficult, you would expect journalists and editors to know the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomadpete Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 "expect journalists and editors to know" Well there's your problem, Peter. A flawed assumption. When we were young, journalists and editors had to have a fair grasp of the English language, to get the job. And the ability to verify their sources, proof read, and spell! But that is all in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man emu Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 Today's journalists believe that the Thesaurus was wiped out in the Cretaceous Extinction Event. ancestor (n.)"one from whom a person is descended," c. 1300, ancestre, antecessour, from Old French ancestre, ancessor "ancestor, forebear, forefather" (12c., Modern French ancêtre), from Late Latin antecessor "predecessor," literally "fore-goer," agent noun from past participle stem of Latin antecedere "to precede," from ante "before" + cedere "to go" descendant c. 1600 (n.) "an individual proceeding from an ancestor in any degree," from French descendant (13c.), present participle of descendre "to come down" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmick Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 I have ancestors and I have descendants, so what does that make me ? I must be the descendant of my ancestors and the ancestor of my descendants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Pretty average I'd say. Nothing special (sorry). Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willedoo Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Never a week goes by but I see a headline or an article that confuses the words ancestor and descendant. Invariably descendants are referred to as ancestors. Today it is a headline asking whether the US government should pay compensation to the ancestors of slaves. Why are these two words confused? There must be something special about them, but I can’t figure it out. It isn’t difficult, you would expect journalists and editors to know the difference. If it's an American article, they have a solid track record of confusion when it comes to the English language. Having said that, our journalists are getting progressively worse in that department as well. Some of the mistakes make you wonder if the journalists write their own version and then a computer programme edits it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Litespeed Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Your on the money, most are edited by computer these days and rarely checked by a human before publishing. Even worse the programs are American, so are clueless to start with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Well it confused me. I said to the wife about how they would need a time machine to pay the ancestors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 The incestors may be a bigger concern. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yenn Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Pretty Average is another statement used in inappropriate ways. but not by Nev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man emu Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Perhaps you are looking for an attractive Mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 I was rather Naive about this till I was enlightened somewhat only a few years ago as to the extent of it "OUT THERE". I don't find the idea easy to go along with for myriad reasons including the POWER relationship which is often at the base of abuse that is most concerning. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 There is a great book by that atheist biologist Dawkins called " the ancestor's tale". Do you know that your great ( repeat about 500 million times) grandmother was a fish? She looked a lot like a coelacanth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willedoo Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 I've heard of a mother in law looking like a fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willedoo Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 There is a great book by that atheist biologist Dawkins called " the ancestor's tale". Do you know that your great ( repeat about 500 million times) grandmother was a fish? She looked a lot like a coelacanth. Bruce, there could be some truth in the theory. [ATTACH]50360._xfImport[/ATTACH] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacesailor Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 NEW theory !. Life began on LAND. In the Oozing Mud-pools. spacesailor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now