Jerry_Atrick Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago There is an article in The Age on the subject matter today: https://www.theage.com.au/technology/kids-playing-with-a-nuclear-warhead-why-we-must-heed-ai-warnings-20260910-p60w2j.html I think the extinction thing is a little overkill (pardon the pun) unless robotics makes incredible strides over a short period of time. However, it won't be as Holywooders and Youtubers would suggest that roboits go rogue or swarms of drones. It will be their ability to crack the systems; of course, there would be real problems if they crack military systems and start guiding nuclear weapons, for example. But, if the world is going to end in 3.5 years for us, may as well take out a 10 year loan on that Ferrari, with a deferred payment for 5 years and live a little 😉
pmccarthy Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago I think any car pre about 1984 is ok as they have no computer on board. My house is a greater threat as my vacuum cleaner and pool robot could rise up against us.
Jerry_Atrick Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago I wish.. AI agents aren't (outwardly) so temperamental.. and they get the issues. 1
Jerry_Atrick Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) Developing and implementing all risk systems for our whole European business. Edited 7 hours ago by Jerry_Atrick 1
nomadpete Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Getting back to the cost/benefit equation. Exactly how is A.I. and data centres going to make life better for the common man? (i.e, the majority of people).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now