Marty_d Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Fully taxpayer funded health and education would be the sign of a civilized country. 1 1
red750 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 hours ago, nomadpete said: I believe we should get rid of health insurance companies Hold that thought. I am having a disagreement with my fund at the moment. I will withhold comment until it is resolved. 2
facthunter Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago You don't REALLY want the Government doing everything. It would be too Cumbersome and people tend to build empires/careers out of a Roundabout. Keep Corruption OUT of things. Shine Lights in dark places. Keep Em Honest. Follow the Money Trail. Nev
Marty_d Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Not everything but health and education are more expensive under private systems. As always, insurance companies need to make a profit for their shareholders so it stands to reason that they will overcharge and under deliver whenever they can get away with it. Our family health cover is around $450/month and we're with one of the better ones. I would much rather pay that in extra taxes and have the public health system improved than give it to overseas investors. The USA is a perfect example of the worst way to do health care. 1 1
nomadpete Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, facthunter said: Keep Em Honest. Follow the Money Trail. Nev Where's a Don Chipp when we need one? 1
old man emu Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 18 hours ago, nomadpete said: I believe we should get rid of health insurance companies and make all medical care into a universal government funded health care programme. Insurance is a system whereby the high value of a risk is covered through small contributions made by very many people. It's a sort of 'manmy hands make light work'. If the insurer is the government, as is the case with Medicare, at least each person contributing a small amount knows that a chunk of that small amount is not being stripped off and handed to investors, as it is with insurance companies. Of course, not 100% of contributions to a government scheme is used to pay medical expenses. There has to be an allowance for administration costs. But that is better than a system which adds investor returns to outlays and administration costs. 1
facthunter Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago It has to be kept efficient. Don't want Hey SLOW down Mate. You're showing US UP. Nev 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now