facthunter Posted September 25 Posted September 25 You still NEED Hydrocarbon fuel for this and can that be assured in today's world.? Nev
red750 Posted September 25 Posted September 25 Who knows? Things change daily. What it means though, starting with a full tank and charge, you could drive Melbourne to Sydney and back to Canberra without a refill. Range anxiety quashed. 1
facthunter Posted September 25 Posted September 25 We don't (have to) import electricity. Unless it's produced by diesel generators. Diesel and Petrol cannot be assured. We are not self sufficient. No fuel. No go at all. No matter how efficient it is. Nev
facthunter Posted September 25 Posted September 25 There's Practically NO servicing needed on a Pure electric car. That "means something" in the Overall Picture.. In a Hybrid, the IC motor gets a fairly hard time. Fuel must be clean and not stale. The car must be electrically alive to run at all. ie start the IC motor. They are inevitably more expensive than a pure ICE vehicle OR an EV. At 8 years most batteries are still 95 % and can be used as storage for Houses etc for years after.. Geely make "straight" EVs. A mate of mine just bought one. Available range is Increasing all the time.. The "early" Prius (Hybrid) were a pile of trouble. The Hondas would hold up semi's on hills . IF you are Just trying to save Money stick to a reliable Older ICE car that you enjoy driving while there's still fuel available and save the expense of any newer stuff which will go on Improving all the time, the longer you wait. Nev 2
old man emu Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Just wathed an Australian video about towing with a BYD Shark and its fuel consumption. The Shark has a small battery and IC engine for charging during use. The bloke was towing a 3 tonne caravan and crossing Queensland east to west. He said that his fuel consumption was 24 litres/100km crossing the Divide, but when he got out on the flat country it went up to about 44 litres/100km. He attributed the difference to the lack of regenerative braking in teh flat country. With that flat country consumption, who could afford to use one of these for towing? As far as I can see, the Shark seems to be a good vehicle, if you are looking to drive a Toorak Tractor.
facthunter Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago You won't get any regenerative in flat Country but there are NO Hills either. That motor set up eliminates the Gearbox and clutch. When you consider the total weight involved it may not be that Bad. Also you don't know how draggy the Caravan is and How fast He went and where the wind was coming from. The Chinese have an ICE that is over 45% efficient. When you have a Lot of wind drag, going a bit slower makes a lot of difference to the Fuel consumption. I don't think it's Fair to call it a Toorak Tractor.. They have a fantastic rear suspension and aren't just Built for Looks. Nev
old man emu Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago What shocked me was the difference between what is supposed to be an environment-saving vehicle, and the dreaded ICE. At least the bloke was honest enough to state the facts as he foind them, even to the apparent detriment of the Shark's popularity. I should be spruiking the glories of the Shark, since my son's business is based on tweeking them, but there are things I simply can't warm to. Admittedly, I haven't driven one, but from what I saw in the video, such as automatic lane management; "gear" selector on the right hand side of the column and indicators on the left, and finally the massive video screen used for user interface, I don't think I would like my first drives. Besides, I think that a dual-cab ute with a truncated cargo area is as useless as tits on a bull.
red750 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago I know it's a totally different animal, but my 22 year old Holden Astra, a rebadged German Opel, has the turn indicators on the left of the column, wiper/washers on the right. My daughter, for God knows what reason, has her heart set on a Ford Mach 1, the electric version of the Mustang. It has the 'gear' selector on the right of the column.
facthunter Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago How many "Such" vehicles can legally pull 3 tons. Authorities are pretty tough on enforcement of weight Limits.. " Useless as an ashtray on a 1/8th mile drag bike" supersedes the tits on a bull " bit. You don't have to think about it for as long. . The Reversing of the turn Indicator windscreen/ washer thing scratches a lot of windscreens .Nev
Marty_d Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 12 hours ago, old man emu said: Just wathed an Australian video about towing with a BYD Shark and its fuel consumption. The Shark has a small battery and IC engine for charging during use. The bloke was towing a 3 tonne caravan and crossing Queensland east to west. He said that his fuel consumption was 24 litres/100km crossing the Divide, but when he got out on the flat country it went up to about 44 litres/100km. He attributed the difference to the lack of regenerative braking in teh flat country. With that flat country consumption, who could afford to use one of these for towing? As far as I can see, the Shark seems to be a good vehicle, if you are looking to drive a Toorak Tractor. 44 litres/100km is woeful. Almost a litre every 2km. Admittedly our caravan was half that weight and being a fold down camper was not much higher than the car roof, but our Santa Fe got 11 litres/100km when towing it.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now