Grumpy Old Nasho Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Better stick to petrol cars I think. No power to weight ratio restrictions. No charging batteries for 1/2 an hour if a charging station can be found, and hoping no one else is using it. How quickly do the batteries discharge if the trip to town is uphill nearly all the way? That's my predicament, uphill for 80ks, downhill coming home. Checking my petrol mileage via my liters per 100ks gauge, much more petrol is used going to town than coming home. If I had an electric car, I probably would have to charge the battery in town so I could get back home. But what if there were motorists lined up to use the charging station? How long does it take for each car to be charged? I might be there all night waiting. 1
Marty_d Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Then don't get an electric car if it doesn't suit you. If town is only 80km away why would you have to charge there? Even if it being all uphill used twice as much charge as usual, that's only 160km and obviously you'd use half as much charge going downhill, so another 40km makes 200 for your round trip. Most EVs have a range of 450 or more so just charge at home. 1
facthunter Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I'm pretty certain some ICE cars are called high Performance also and have restrictions on who can drive them. You don't see electric cars doing silly things on the roads as it reduces your range. (Well, I've NEVER seen one so far). They don't make any Broom Broom noises to show off. either. Where's this hill that 80 Kms and uphill ALL the way?? Every time you back off the battery gets some charge. EV's don't wear Brake Pads very Much. Nev 1
octave Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: Better stick to petrol cars I think. No one is trying to convince you to get an EV. 33 minutes ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: How quickly do the batteries discharge if the trip to town is uphill nearly all the way? That's my predicament, uphill for 80ks, downhill coming home. Uphill does, of course, use more energy; not only does going downhill on the return not use energy, it actually gains energy through regenerative braking (whilst saving brake pad wear). My son has to drive up and down a long, steep hill (NZ). Going downhill, you will end up with a higher state of charge than you started with. Of course on the return journey, you still have to get back up the hill (not 100% effective). 38 minutes ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: If I had an electric car, I probably would have to charge the battery in town so I could get back home. I can't think of any EVs that would not comfortably do that trip. You can then plug in at home, and if you have solar, it is virtually free. 1
kgwilson Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I have seen my SOC go up on a long downhill run from Dorrigo to Bellingen on the Waterfall way. It added about 50km to the range at the bottom. Going up used a lot more though than I recovered which is expected. When going downhill for a long stretch it is a good idea to use the highest regeneration setting. One Pedal driving is the highest in my car as it will bring the car to a standstill without using the brakes. I use OPD usually in towns as there is so much stop start driving. EVs are very economical in city driving partly due to the stop/start & Regen but also due to when stopped no energy is being used at all except for the 12 volt electrical system that runs everything except the cars traction system. 1
Grumpy Old Nasho Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, facthunter said: Where's this hill that 80 Kms and uphill ALL the way?? My place is a certain height above sea level. The town I go to is even higher above sea level. That's what I mean by "uphill all the way". 1
octave Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, Grumpy Old Nasho said: That's what I mean by "uphill all the way". And surely downhill on the way back
pmccarthy Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago Nearest towns are 20 minutes either way. When I go downhill to town my Prado gets about 7 l/100 km. When I go the other way, uphill to the other town, I get about 11 l/100km. Of course. 1
old man emu Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago On a trip to Sydney and back, my ICE uses more fuel coming home because I have to climb from near sea level in Sydney to about 3,500 ft at the top of the Blue Mountains. The gradient of tht climb is steeper than the climb coming from the other side on the way to Sydney. Also I don't have to "drive" the car from the top to the bottom when I an on my way to Sydney. The need for more fuel to go up a steep hill is commonsense. The same commonsense that applies to an EV, hybrid, plug in or diesel.
onetrack Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago (edited) I've never seen anyone lose traction, chuck a burnout or do a wheelie in an EV, so I'm at a loss to explain how the higher powered EV's are dangerous. I have seen a Tesla zip away from the lights very rapidly, though - much faster than even I could keep up in a 2.5L Camry Atara, which has reasonably fast acceleration when you floor it. The Camry weighs 1465kgs and has 135Kw of power (180HP in the old money), so it's not underpowered. But that Tesla went like a cut cat let out of a bag. And my bottom line is - I went from Perth to Albany and back (over 800kms total) in early March, and got 6.1 litres/100km with two people and their luggage aboard, averaging around 105kmh, so it could be quite a while before I can warrant lashing out on an EV. Edited 16 minutes ago by onetrack
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now