What now on Charlie Kirk?

[Marty_d]

The alternative is worse.

If for example you surprise a skinny harmless person who thought the house was empty and was either stealing or looking for somewhere to sleep... I don't think someone who kills a person like that should be exempt from prosecution.

[facthunter]

You are covering the 2 sides and that's good. I have 2 Dogs and they make me feel safer, Nev

[Jerry_Atrick]

23 hours ago, pmccarthy said:

The problem is that you will probably have to defend yourself in court. The time and cost for a successful legal defence will transform your life, when all you did was physically defend yourself.

 

The "castle" doctrine does not change this. Even that article effectively admits it. It would be very dangerous if it did

[ClintonB]

Maybe the yanks should understand if you want to be all biblical about things when it suits you, you should be able to wear the consequences.

Was there not a quote in the bible that you will reap what you sow. If you sow the seeds of hatred, you have to expect that hatred will be returned.

they ( the yanks and most other religious kooks) love to push their views and interpretations of them, but are not so good at receiving the results in return. It is very hypocritical of them.