red750 Posted May 1 Posted May 1 At a recent NewsNation Town Hall, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sounded the alarm on the potential health risks of 5G technology, urging the public and policymakers to take a closer look. Citing a growing body of research on electromagnetic radiation (EMR), Kennedy pointed to studies showing that even short-term exposure to 1.3 GHz radiation allowed small molecules—like D-mannitol—to cross the blood-brain barrier in rats. He warned that prolonged, low-level EMR exposure could lead to subtle but significant health effects over time. Kennedy also referenced controversial studies linking high EMR exposure to tumor development in lab animals, challenging the mainstream narrative. While agencies like the FDA maintain there’s no conclusive link between mobile phone use and cancer, Kennedy argues that current safety standards are outdated and fail to account for the pulsed radiation patterns unique to 5G. Importantly, Kennedy clarified he’s not calling for a ban on phones. Instead, he’s advocating for more rigorous safety testing, greater transparency, and increased public education. In an era driven by ever-faster technology, Kennedy’s cautionary stance encourages society to pause and consider whether speed is coming at the cost of long-term health.
Marty_d Posted May 2 Posted May 2 RFK is a brain-dead moron and every utterance from his mouth should be treated with the utmost suspicion. 1 1
old man emu Posted May 2 Posted May 2 The controversy over the radiation effects of mobile phones came up 20-odd years ago. Experience seems to have discounted the idea of harmful effects. (I have no independent reference for that comment.) Notice that Kennedy referred to high EMR exposure. It is reasonable to say that anything taken in high doses is harmful. Moderation in all things. 2
facthunter Posted May 2 Posted May 2 (edited) Especially Wealth. It gives illusions of invulnerability and exclusiveness and Power. Death is the Final Leveler. None of Us get out of this Alive. Nev Edited May 2 by facthunter spelling
spacesailor Posted May 2 Posted May 2 (edited) if . We didn't die . We would not need children . or SEX . spacesailor Edited May 2 by spacesailor
Marty_d Posted May 2 Posted May 2 5 hours ago, spacesailor said: if . We didn't die . We would not need children . or SEX . spacesailor Some days I'm with you on the children thing. 1 1
nomadpete Posted May 2 Posted May 2 5 hours ago, facthunter said: Life is a sexually transmitted Terminal Disease. Nev Correction.... LIFE is a Terminal STD. Nobody gets out of this game alive. But I'm havin a ball until then!
spacesailor Posted May 2 Posted May 2 Please. Don't keep saying " death is permanent " . As I , & others have' rejoined this ' Happy Human Tribe ' . Been there done that . Didn't like it . so . Here I am ' again ' . spacesailor 1
red750 Posted May 2 Author Posted May 2 For 99.999% it is permanent. You just happen to be one of the 0.001%
spacesailor Posted May 3 Posted May 3 That the " good bit " .look how many offspring's are here ' because ' . I often wonder how many of the " one hundred terminal children '' survived, ( 1 female died ,but recovered 'documented ' ) . It is possible the test's were done ' secretly ' , but hopefully there is records somewhere. " there's she & me ". I do hope we are Not the only two . spacesailor
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now