Dax Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Came across this article from the daily mail, When reading a bit about the aim of sending a space vehicle to Proxima centauri, which has a rocky planet in it's habitable zone as do the other members of the centaur group of stars. Some class the mail as being a sus publication, but it does report subjects you don't find on other news sites. I suppose this subject is a bit like UFO's. there seems evidence we are being visited, but most of the claims turn out to be misinterpreted sightings. The ones that they can;t explain, are classed as not identifiable with no evidence of them being extra terrestrial. This article provides photographic evidence which standard scientists claim are just rocks, but how do these rocks move to the positions they have. Yet they are perfectly formed circular shapes. Whether they are or aren't is anyone's guess, in my opinion there is no reason why fungi could not exist on mars. Problem with living things on mars is, it would destroy most people ideological belief systems as they maintain the earth is unique for life in the universe. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9546225/Scientists-claim-evidence-FUNGI-Red-Planet.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacesailor Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 It would be a ' great laugh ' if NASA discovered humans inhabited Mars before we killed it, and emigrated to this planet. spacesailor 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dax Posted July 14, 2021 Author Share Posted July 14, 2021 Yes it would, have often thought about that and it would solve all the old cave drawings and many other things which haven't been able to be explained. I can't see any reason why there wouldn't be some for or life on mars, like fungi of some description. Some times think most humans are scared to accept there is probably other life in our solar system, however very different to what's on earth. We do know there's life in some of the most hostile environments on earth, would be good of NASA explained how those almost perfectly flat round things in the photo's in the article happen to come and go, when the rovers tracks are undisturbed an have them there after the rover has passed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacesailor Posted July 15, 2021 Share Posted July 15, 2021 When an advanced race ends up in an desolate environment. Their resorces will eventually run out, then they will retrograde back to the simple life without their scientifically enhance lifestyles. Like No antigravity lifting, Laser cutting. Even have to use an open fire to cook with( no Microwave ). spacesailor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty_d Posted July 15, 2021 Share Posted July 15, 2021 We have antigravity? When did this happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacesailor Posted July 15, 2021 Share Posted July 15, 2021 When the Cave men could lift themselves up to great heights, as well as objects that were moved in Prehistory ( Stonehenge ). Plus lots more around the world. spacesailor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willedoo Posted July 15, 2021 Share Posted July 15, 2021 (edited) No mystery with Stonehenge - Wally Wallington figured it out: Edited July 15, 2021 by willedoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacesailor Posted July 15, 2021 Share Posted July 15, 2021 Thats one, many left, And to put the cross piece on the top of his two uprights ?. spacesailor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onetrack Posted July 15, 2021 Share Posted July 15, 2021 There was no anti-gravity "mystery lifting" with the Coral Castle, either - despite what many people, including a multitude of journalists, alluded to. https://www.livescience.com/41075-coral-castle.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmccarthy Posted July 15, 2021 Share Posted July 15, 2021 At least we know why they built Stonehenge. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9750957/Architects-concept-Stonehenge-rocks-base-Neolithic-temple-brought-life-models.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willedoo Posted July 16, 2021 Share Posted July 16, 2021 21 hours ago, spacesailor said: Thats one, many left, And to put the cross piece on the top of his two uprights ?. spacesailor spacy, what if he set up his seesaw thing beside two upright blocks. He could raise the horizontal block (if he's game or mad enough) to just slightly above the two uprights. Then with levers or pulleys, just slide it across somehow. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacesailor Posted July 16, 2021 Share Posted July 16, 2021 Feasible,! BUT such a lot of work to erect 100uprights then to put on capstones ( lintels ). Now it is becoming a ' two storied, thatched roofed ' building, that is the same size as ' Shakspeare,s ' Globe theatre . spacesailor 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmccarthy Posted July 16, 2021 Share Posted July 16, 2021 The thatched building theory is the first sensible explanation I have seen for the mortise and tenon setup on the stones. It would take some lateral thrust. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now