rgmwa

I suspect the referendum may get over the line, mainly because most people are likely to feel that some acknowledgement of the fact that the Aborigines were here first should be formally recognised in the Constitution, even if they have no idea what the Voice is about or how it's going to work (or more likely not). What makes it even more confusing is the obvious disagreement between different Aboriginal individuals about whether they even want a Voice, and the persistent talk about a Treaty of some sort. However despite their justified confusion, most people are likely to think that doing something is better than doing nothing and vote yes.

Yea and verily.

Wishful thinking.

Possibly poorer but no wiser too?

On the other hand, did he mean uncommon low-life?

He looks good but she looks a lot better. Wonder what happened to the other three.

As long as I don't hear about my passing, I'm not worried.

An example of modern digital manipulation of modern phone images?

Probably the most believable part of the show.

Fatal stall then?

Stall demonstration. (Turn off the annoying soundtrack). https://twitter.com/maz_jovanovich/status/1614418939077087232

James Bond solved that problem a while ago. You just need a button on the gearstick.

Here's an interesting comparison with other countries: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2021/aug/mirror-mirror-2021-reflecting-poorly

They may be deluded but they're not stupid. Eventually the penny will drop, especially as it seems most of the population is becoming more uneasy about the increasing time and cost of this quick victory that they've been promised.

It will be interesting to see how the Russian public reacts if he decides on another round of conscription. That would surely make them question the alleged success of the SMO.

Their appeals court just overturned the ban on bump stocks that was introduced after some madman shot about 58 people (from memory). The gun lobby argued that the bump stock technically didn't make the rifle into a machine gun as per the definition of a machine gun, because the trigger was pulled separately on each `bump'. Therefore it was just a rapidly firing rifle and not a machine gun/automatic weapon. The court agreed. What is it with these people?

Yes, ran it a few times.

We're on MBN and fast.com says our speed is only 12Mpbs. That sounds pretty poor, although our connection speed seems OK. Maybe a case of what you don't have you don't miss?

If McCarthy eventually rolls over enough to somehow get his hands on the gavel, he will be so weak the loonies will run the show and Congress will be completely dysfunctional. If he doesn't, the loonies will run the show and Congress will be completely dysfunctional. What a shambles.

I periodically get invitations from Microsoft to upgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11 for free. Reading through the list of differences between 10 and 11, it seems to actually be more limited in most areas, and do more in things I'm not interested in. Is upgrading worthwhile?

Heard a BBC journalist based in Moscow today comment on what the Russian population think. He said his team had travelled widely through the country talking to people. His view was that a very vocal 10% or so were fully behind Putin, while a less vocal 10% were totally opposed to the war. The rest were being fed a steady diet of official propaganda but also hearing lots of stories and rumours that were making them feel uneasy, but not enough to take any action. Basically they were trying to ignore Putin and the war and just getting on with their lives. His view was that the longer this drags on the more likely the silent majority may start to show some real opposition to what’s going on. No doubt Putin is well aware of that risk too.

Not much room for improvement.

That's just one of them.

Looks like the House Committee has decided to make Trump's tax returns public. Should be interesting but I would have thought a risky move politically. I half expected them to rely on the returns turning up as evidence in his business trials, being leaked to the newspapers and made public that way. The result would have been the same but they would have avoided setting what will be seen as a partisan precedent.

Even if they decide not to make them public they could presumably be subpoenaed by the various prosecutors investigating Trump’s business dealings.