rgmwa Posted Sunday at 03:10 AM Posted Sunday at 03:10 AM Presumably it would be trained using published data in the same way a human researcher would. The facts wouldn’t be owned by anyone if they were publicly available. If the AI hacked into proprietary data that might be a problem.
nomadpete Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago OK. Should this go here, or 'wot trump did today'? The Whithouse opened a new A.I. gov website. Using Super Intelligence, it told public true answers ....... until the admin changed it's programming to be less honest. https://youtu.be/aAFzt-ee5L0?si=WU2dJA1D4O7BzFYx
old man emu Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, nomadpete said: OK. Should this go here, or 'wot trump did today'? Tough call! A certain number keeps coming into my mind - 1984.
nomadpete Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, old man emu said: Tough call! A certain number keeps coming into my mind - 1984. And the Ministry of Truth. Where history is continually revised to reflect whatever dear leader says each day. Tis about time we make '1984' and 'Brave New World' compulsory reading for everyone.
old man emu Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago If we members here want to get an understanding of AI, I suggest they read this Wikipedia entry describing the history of AI. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_artificial_intelligence to acquant themselves with the road AI has travelled from a confluence of ideas that became prevalent in the late 1930s, 1940s, and early 1950s. In 1950, Turing published a landmark paper, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence", in which he speculated about the possibility of creating machines that think.[53][b] In the paper, he noted that "thinking" is difficult to define and devised his famous Turing test: If a machine could carry on a conversation (over a teleprinter) that was indistinguishable from a conversation with a human being, then it was reasonable to say that the machine was "thinking"
facthunter Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago Some conversations with Some humans involves little thinking.. . Knowledge is not the same as thinking. A conversation in abstractions might be a good test. Also discourse on Philosophy Art and Logic would be interesting. Intelligence is the ability to process and apply Inputs. Memory may be Photographic. Big advantage. Nev
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now