Jerry_Atrick Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago There is no law requiring an MP live in the constituency they represent, nor is there an issue with someone moving house. But, here is the AI view of the world of Victorian MPs. Interestingly, as in the UK, there appears to be an expectation that the <P does live in their constituency. Though I do wonder how a premier or senior cabinet minister can spare the time t represent their constituency in the same way as a back-bencher, so not sure it matters that much where they live. But, I would guess the coalition and Greens (and I guess, any independents that may be in Vic) do see it as very important. At the leadership level, maybe we should be concerned about her policies, integrity (personal and government), and her (and her team's) ability to execute. Shall we use this thread as a discussion in the run up to the Vic election in November?
old man emu Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Isn't a Local Member supposed to be local so that they are sensitive to the matters importnat to that electorate?
facthunter Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago She probably still has to shop in Bendigo. What a beat up. Land would be cheaper. It's not like it far away. nev 1
pmccarthy Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago The surveys are saying she is likely to lose Bendigo to Andrew Lethlean. I met him on Saturday, he is an impressive alternative. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now