Jerry_Atrick Posted August 17, 2020 Share Posted August 17, 2020 Montgomery has become my son's role model of late... and as it transpires, as a lad, he used to stay at our house quite a bit as his uncle lived in it them (I am guessing, as an old rectory, it was in the CoE's ownerhip at the time). Anyway, this is a very interesting intervire with him.. how times have changed... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1dz3pqbRaw 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willedoo Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 (edited) Thanks Jerry. That was a highly interesting interview. First time I've listened to a full length interview with Monty; I was surprised how good a speaker he was. One interesting comment he made was of the importance of controlling the seas. At the time of the interview, the PLAN was not an issue, but his words ring true now with the decline in U.S. Navy shipbuilding capability compared with the Chinese. Some forecasts put the PLAN equaling the USN within ten to twenty years. I'm sure if Monty was alive today he'd have some interesting observations on current world problems. Edited August 21, 2020 by willedoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Tuncks Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 Surely your son doesn't mean the Montgomery general of WW2? He is down in my book as a nasty and stupid man, which for WW2 generals is saying a lot. Just look up the invasion of Sicily as an example. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgwilson Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 Like all Generals Monty made mistakes. Probably his biggest was Operation Market Garden. But he also had many successes. He was though a very good leader and his men followed him willingly. Patton on the other hand was the complete opposite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_Atrick Posted August 23, 2020 Author Share Posted August 23, 2020 I am no student of history... but when I ran through with my son the battle of Sicily, it didn't appear to be that silly. They lost 4000-odd allies and the enemy lost over 8,000.. It toppled Mussoulini, but it did result in Hitler's decision to invade Italy.. which further spread their toops and resources thinner as well.. Anyway, my son keeps pointing out, as Willedoo has, that he had the forsight to siggest controlling the seas, which is as important today as it has been.. Also, as KG states, he seemed to be a leader men could relate to form a battle perspective. Yep..we all make mistakes.. Unf., when a field marshall or general makes a mistake, lives are lost... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Tuncks Posted August 23, 2020 Share Posted August 23, 2020 Have you guys studied the glider-bourne attack on Sicily? Many officers who knew about those gliders tried to tell Montgomery that he was committing a stupid act which would kill hundreds of troops for no advantage. He sent them all packing, displaying all of his small-man's mental health problems, but with the power to do what he liked, he pressed ahead. In the event, the carnage was worse than even the most pessimistic predictions. Imagine "landing" a 7,500 pounds aerial barge ( loaded stalling speed 80 knots) in a tiny sloping sicilian paddock, surrounded by stone fencing, at night. Too few troops got out uninjured to achieve anything. I would have put Montgomery in the first glider. AND the airbourne invasion was towed directly over a fleet of warships which had been bombed for many nights. A lot of the gliders were unhooked from the towing Dakotas to try to ditch. But the flimsy plywood gliders exploded on touching the sea. Many of those troops died before having the opportunity to crash in Sicily. Alerting ships on the way was a clear responsibility of the planning general. As was knowing what would happen when they tried to land. Of course, the whole idea of attacking Sicily was stupid, but this was probably Churchill's stupidity and not Montgomery's. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onetrack Posted August 24, 2020 Share Posted August 24, 2020 (edited) There were plenty of serious errors and bad tactical decisions made by Montgomery, but the establishment always has to produce its heroes. One of the major successes of the Italian campaign was the efforts of the U.S. Aviation Engineers, who landed with the front-line infantry with their bulldozers and Carryalls - and they had built an aerodrome from scratch, capable of taking bombers, that was fully operational within 2 days of the landing at Licata in Sicily. Those who ruled the air in WW2, won - and the Allied forces had the major airpower forces - plus they were ably backed by the Aviation Engineers who produced and repaired the front-line airfields, to enable the Allied aircraft to constantly move forward. https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/AAF/VII/AAF-VII-9.html Edited August 24, 2020 by onetrack 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Tuncks Posted August 27, 2020 Share Posted August 27, 2020 I agree about the establishment protecting its heroes. Sir William Slim turned out to be a paedophile, but to this day his memory is protected. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Tuncks Posted September 1, 2020 Share Posted September 1, 2020 When I was a kid, the Alice Spring School had in its foyer a portrait of QE2 ( Elizabeth ) and Sir William Slim. The latter was the Governor-general and the Queen's rep in Australia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now