rgmwa
-
Posts
1,278 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
rgmwa's Achievements
-
They should have edited out 90% and even then it would have been too long. It’s almost inconceivable that this incoherent clown is the US president.
-
… and preferably not in the water.
-
Rudd had to sit there and take it and Albo had to deflect what could have an even worse situation for Australia's interests, but Rudd was right about Trump the first time.
-
I think most people in the western world would agree with you, but it’s certainly not universal. Cultural upbringing is a big factor in how humans treat other animals.
-
Not the best location to build a beach house these days:
-
Good news if it's true. His popularity has been declining since day one.
-
Celebrating Positives (offset of the Gripes Thread)
rgmwa replied to Jerry_Atrick's topic in General Discussion
It's a good thing you don't write computer programs. -
You wouldn't expect him to remember the dot points about Japanese etiquette even if he'd been briefed before he got off the plane.
-
Well, a `medium to very low chance of at least zero' rain, is a funny way to say no rain expected but I guess they are stuck with the heading format which works fine for when some rain is forecast.
-
This doesn't make much sense to me.
-
Trump already knows exactly what Kevin thinks of him, and the unfortunate reality is that both Kevin and Albo have to deal with him in looking after Australia’s interests.
-
Sometimes GON, I think you just like stirring the pot. Do you really believe what you just said? Trump is trashing everything around him and enriching himself in the process. He is the most corrupt person to ever become president, and there is nothing that he is doing that is making America great.
-
I can't fly in the rain.
-
Yes, no problem with that. I just prefer to know what the chance of rain is, not what it isn’t. Just makes more sense to me but it’s not a big issue. To paraphrase Groucho Marx, if you don’t like that complaint, I have others.
-
Apparently tomorrow we have a 100% chance of no rain. Seems like a strange way to describe it. So when we have a 100% chance of rain I assume it’s going to be expressed as 0% chance of no rain! Whar are they thinking? What’s wrong with the old ‘x% chance of rain tomorrow’. That makes a lot more sense to me.
